STUDY OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the effectiveness of heart rate variability (HRV) biofeedback as a complementary treatment for asthma. PATIENTS: Ninety-four adult outpatient paid volunteers with asthma. SETTING:The psychophysiology laboratory at The University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, and the private outpatient offices of participating asthma physicians. INTERVENTIONS: The interventions were as follows: (1) a full protocol (ie, HRV biofeedback and abdominal breathing through pursed lips and prolonged exhalation); (2) HRV biofeedback alone; (3) placebo EEG biofeedback; and (4) a waiting list control. DESIGN: Subjects were first prestabilized using controller medication and then were randomly assigned to experimental groups. Medication was titrated biweekly by blinded asthma specialists according to a protocol based on National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute guidelines, according to symptoms, spirometry, and home peak flows. MEASUREMENTS: Subjects recorded daily asthma symptoms and twice-daily peak expiratory flows. Spirometry was performed before and after each weekly treatment session under the HRV and placebo biofeedback conditions, and at triweekly assessment sessions under the waiting list condition. Oscillation resistance was measured approximately triweekly. RESULTS: Compared with the two control groups, subjects in both of the two HRV biofeedback groups were prescribed less medication, with minimal differences between the two active treatments. Improvements averaged one full level of asthma severity. Measures from forced oscillation pneumography similarly showed improvement in pulmonary function. A placebo effect influenced an improvement in asthma symptoms, but not in pulmonary function. Groups did not differ in the occurrence of severe asthma flares. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that HRV biofeedback may prove to be a useful adjunct to asthma treatment and may help to reduce dependence on steroid medications. Further evaluation of this method is warranted.
RCT Entities:
STUDY OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the effectiveness of heart rate variability (HRV) biofeedback as a complementary treatment for asthma. PATIENTS: Ninety-four adult outpatient paid volunteers with asthma. SETTING: The psychophysiology laboratory at The University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, and the private outpatient offices of participating asthma physicians. INTERVENTIONS: The interventions were as follows: (1) a full protocol (ie, HRV biofeedback and abdominal breathing through pursed lips and prolonged exhalation); (2) HRV biofeedback alone; (3) placebo EEG biofeedback; and (4) a waiting list control. DESIGN: Subjects were first prestabilized using controller medication and then were randomly assigned to experimental groups. Medication was titrated biweekly by blinded asthma specialists according to a protocol based on National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute guidelines, according to symptoms, spirometry, and home peak flows. MEASUREMENTS: Subjects recorded daily asthma symptoms and twice-daily peak expiratory flows. Spirometry was performed before and after each weekly treatment session under the HRV and placebo biofeedback conditions, and at triweekly assessment sessions under the waiting list condition. Oscillation resistance was measured approximately triweekly. RESULTS: Compared with the two control groups, subjects in both of the two HRV biofeedback groups were prescribed less medication, with minimal differences between the two active treatments. Improvements averaged one full level of asthma severity. Measures from forced oscillation pneumography similarly showed improvement in pulmonary function. A placebo effect influenced an improvement in asthma symptoms, but not in pulmonary function. Groups did not differ in the occurrence of severe asthma flares. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that HRV biofeedback may prove to be a useful adjunct to asthma treatment and may help to reduce dependence on steroid medications. Further evaluation of this method is warranted.
Authors: Maria Fonoberova; Igor Mezić; Jennifer F Buckman; Vladimir A Fonoberov; Adriana Mezić; Evgeny G Vaschillo; Eun-Young Mun; Bronya Vaschillo; Marsha E Bates Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2014-07-25 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: Hiago M Melo; Thiago C Martins; Lucas M Nascimento; Alexandre A Hoeller; Roger Walz; Emílio Takase Journal: Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol Date: 2018-06-04 Impact factor: 1.468
Authors: Paul M Lehrer; Charles G Irvin; Shou-En Lu; Anthony Scardella; Beatrix Roehmheld-Hamm; Milisyaris Aviles-Velez; Jessica Graves; Evgeny G Vaschillo; Bronya Vaschillo; Flavia Hoyte; Harold Nelson; Frederick S Wamboldt Journal: Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback Date: 2018-03
Authors: Jonathan M Feldman; Lynne Matte; Alejandro Interian; Paul M Lehrer; Shou-En Lu; Bari Scheckner; Dara M Steinberg; Tanya Oken; Anu Kotay; Sumita Sinha; Chang Shim Journal: Behav Res Ther Date: 2016-09-17