Literature DB >> 15302695

Congenital choledochal cysts in adults.

Brendan C Visser1, Insoo Suh, Lawrence W Way, Sang-Mo Kang.   

Abstract

HYPOTHESIS: Excision of the extrahepatic portion of congenital choledochal cysts (CCs) avoids the risk of cancer. The standard classification scheme is out of date.
DESIGN: Retrospective case series and literature review.
SETTING: Tertiary care university hospital. PATIENTS: Thirty-eight adult patients diagnosed as having CC from 1990 to 2004. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Clinical and radiographic imaging findings, operative treatment, pathologic features, and clinical outcome.
RESULTS: Thirty-nine adult patients were treated for CCs (mean [SD] age at diagnosis, 31 [17] years, and mean [SD] age at surgery 37 [14] years). The primary report was abdominal pain (36 of 39 patients). Eight patients had cholangitis, 5 had jaundice, and 6 had pancreatitis. Radiographic imaging studies and operative findings showed that the abnormality predominantly involved the extrahepatic bile duct in 30 patients, the intrahepatic and extrahepatic bile ducts in 7 patients; and 2 were diverticula attached to the common bile duct. Surgical treatment in 29 (90%) of 31 patients with benign cysts (regardless of intrahepatic changes) consisted of resection of the enlarged extrahepatic bile duct and gallbladder and Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy. Eight patients (21%) were initially seen with associated cancer (cholangiocarcinoma of the extrahepatic duct in 6; gallbladder cancer in 2). Seven of 8 patients had a prior diagnosis of CC but had undergone a drainage operation (3 patients), expectant treatment (3 patients), or incomplete excision (1patient). In none of the patients with cancer was surgery not curative. Nine patients had previously undergone a cystoduodenostomy and/or cystojejunostomy as children. Four of them had cancer on presentation as adults. There were no postoperative deaths. Cancer subsequently developed in no patient whose benign extrahepatic cyst was excised, regardless of the extent of enlargement of the intrahepatic bile duct.
CONCLUSIONS: Congenital CCs consist principally of congenital dilation of the extrahepatic bile duct with a variable amount of intrahepatic involvement. We believe that the standard classification scheme is confusing, unsupported by evidence, misleading, and serves no purpose. The distinction between type I and type IV CCs has to be arbitrary, for the intrahepatic ducts were never completely normal. Although Caroli disease may resemble CCs morphologically, with respect to cause and clinical course, the 2 are unrelated. The other rare anomalies (gallbladderlike diverticula; choledochocele) are also unrelated to CC. Therefore, the term "congential choledochal cyst" should be exclusively reserved for congenital dilation of the extrahepatic and intrahepatic bile ducts apart from Caroli disease, and the other conditions should be referred to by their names, for example, choledochocele, and should no longer be thought of as subtypes of CC. Our data demonstrate once again a persistent tendency to recommend expectant treatment in patients without symptoms and the extreme risk of nonexcisional treatment. The entire extrahepatic biliary tree should be removed when CC is diagnosed whether or not symptoms are present. The outcome of that approach was excellent.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15302695     DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.139.8.855

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Surg        ISSN: 0004-0010


  39 in total

1.  Laparoscopic surgery for removal of choledochal cysts and Roux-en-Y anastomosis.

Authors:  Baochun Lu; Zhihong Shen; Jianhua Yu; Jianhui Yang; Haijun Tang; Hongli Ma
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-08-15

2.  Impact of previous cyst-enterostomy on patients' outcome following resection of bile duct cysts.

Authors:  Mehdi Ouaissi; Reza Kianmanesh; Emilia Ragot; Jacques Belghiti; Pietro Majno; Gennaro Nuzzo; Remi Dubois; Yann Revillon; Daniel Cherqui; Daniel Azoulay; Christian Letoublon; François-René Pruvot; François Paye; Patrick Rat; Karim Boudjema; Adeline Roux; Jean-Yves Mabrut; Jean-François Gigot
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-06-27

3.  Choledochal Cyst or Benign Biliary Dilation: Is Resection Always Necessary?

Authors:  Camilla Gomes; Patrick Tivnan; David McAneny; Jennifer F Tseng; Jaroslaw Tkacz; Teviah E Sachs
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2021-01-22       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 4.  Choledochal cysts: part 2 of 3: Diagnosis.

Authors:  Janakie Singham; Eric M Yoshida; Charles H Scudamore
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 5.  Choledochal cysts: part 1 of 3: classification and pathogenesis.

Authors:  Janakie Singham; Eric M Yoshida; Charles H Scudamore
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 6.  Endoscopic ultrasound in common bile duct dilatation with normal liver enzymes.

Authors:  Claudio De Angelis; Milena Marietti; Mauro Bruno; Rinaldo Pellicano; Mario Rizzetto
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-07-10

Review 7.  Pancreatic ductal system obstruction and acute recurrent pancreatitis.

Authors:  M Delhaye; C Matos; M Arvanitakis; J Deviere
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-02-21       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Choledochal cysts: analysis of disease pattern and optimal treatment in adult and paediatric patients.

Authors:  Janakie Singham; David Schaeffer; Eric Yoshida; Charles Scudamore
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.647

9.  The changing presentation of choledochal cyst disease: an incidental diagnosis.

Authors:  Rajeev Dhupar; Brian Gulack; David A Geller; J Wallis Marsh; T Clark Gamblin
Journal:  HPB Surg       Date:  2009-10-19

Review 10.  Imaging features of adult choledochal cysts: a pictorial review.

Authors:  Hae Kyung Lee; Seong Jin Park; Bum Ha Yi; A Leum Lee; Jong Ho Moon; Yun Woo Chang
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2009 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.500

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.