| Literature DB >> 15301634 |
Jenny L Wiley1, Kari L LaVecchia, Natalie E Karp, Sanjitha Kulasegram, Anu Mahadevan, Raj K Razdan, Billy R Martin.
Abstract
Efforts to determine whether Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol (Delta(9)-THC) and anandamide elicit similar discriminative stimulus effects have yielded conflicting results. The difficulty in establishing a discriminative cue to anandamide may be due to its metabolic instability. Rats were trained to discriminate either Delta(9)-THC or O-1812, a metabolically stable anandamide analog, from vehicle to avoid this issue. O-1812 and Delta(9)-THC substituted for each other; however, both drugs were more potent in the O-1812-trained rats. Further, O-1812 only substituted for Delta(9)-THC at response rate decreasing doses. The CB(1) antagonist, SR141716A, blocked the discriminative stimulus effects of both drugs but augmented their rate effects. O-1839, a VR(1) agonist, failed to substitute for either cannabinoid. These results suggest that the discriminative stimulus effects of Delta(9)-THC and O-1812 are similar, but subtle differences also exist.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2004 PMID: 15301634 DOI: 10.1037/1064-1297.12.3.173
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Exp Clin Psychopharmacol ISSN: 1064-1297 Impact factor: 3.157