Literature DB >> 15301604

On the transience of egocentric working memory: evidence from testing the contribution of limbic brain regions.

A L Baird1, J E Putter, J L Muir, J P Aggleton.   

Abstract

Rats trained on a nonmatching-to-turn rule revealed that egocentric working memory is readily disrupted, hard to use, and transient. In Experiment 1, rats failed to acquire the rule in a plus-maze. Experiment 2 used 2 different plus-mazes to remove any intramaze cues. Task acquisition occurred only when rats could use direction cues (i.e., nonegocentric cues). In Experiments 3 and 4, a J maze was used to minimize the retention interval and eliminate handling rats within a trial. All rats acquired the nonmatching rule, although a 3-s retention delay severely impaired performance. Fornix lesions transiently disrupted performance of the J-maze task (Experiments 3 and 4), but neither fornix (Experiment 1) nor retrosplenial (Experiment 2) lesions impaired the plus-maze tasks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15301604     DOI: 10.1037/0735-7044.118.4.785

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Neurosci        ISSN: 0735-7044            Impact factor:   1.912


  7 in total

1.  Lateral and anterior thalamic lesions impair independent memory systems.

Authors:  Anna S Mitchell; John C Dalrymple-Alford
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2006 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.460

2.  Dismantling the Papez circuit for memory in rats.

Authors:  Seralynne D Vann
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2013-06-25       Impact factor: 8.140

3.  Competitive short-term and long-term memory processes in spatial habituation.

Authors:  David J Sanderson; David M Bannerman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2011-04

4.  The impact of fornix lesions in rats on spatial learning tasks sensitive to anterior thalamic and hippocampal damage.

Authors:  Julie R Dumont; Eman Amin; Nicholas F Wright; Christopher M Dillingham; John P Aggleton
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2014-10-18       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Learning to use working memory: a reinforcement learning gating model of rule acquisition in rats.

Authors:  Kevin Lloyd; Nadine Becker; Matthew W Jones; Rafal Bogacz
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2012-10-30       Impact factor: 2.380

6.  Deconstructing the Direct Reciprocal Hippocampal-Anterior Thalamic Pathways for Spatial Learning.

Authors:  Andrew J D Nelson; Lisa Kinnavane; Eman Amin; Shane M O'Mara; John P Aggleton
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-08-04       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 7.  Why do lesions in the rodent anterior thalamic nuclei cause such severe spatial deficits?

Authors:  John P Aggleton; Andrew J D Nelson
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2014-09-06       Impact factor: 8.989

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.