Literature DB >> 15301216

Self-etching adhesives and postoperative sensitivity.

Masako Unemori1, Yoko Matsuya, Akane Akashi, Yasuharu Goto, Akifumi Akamine.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To test the hypothesis that the prevention of postoperative sensitivity in resin-based composite restorations is better achieved with a self-etching/self-priming (SE/SP) dentin bonding system without lining than with an early generation total-etch (TE) bonding system.
METHODS: Over a 4-year period, clinical follow-ups were conducted on patients who had received composite restorations. The depth of each cavity was categorized as being shallow, medium or deep, and an evaluation was made regarding the need for pulpal protection for each restoration. Three different self-etching/self-priming (SE/SP) adhesive systems were compared to three different total-etch (TE) adhesive systems. The incidences of postoperative sensitivity (IPS) were examined by a standardized procedure 1 week after placement of the restoration. Patients' ages varied between 16-83 years.
RESULTS: The total number of restorations placed in vital teeth were 330 for 150 patients in the SE/SP group, and 126 for 70 patients in the TE group. Incidences of IPS in the total number of restorations stratified for depth were 14% in deep cavities, 6% in medium depth cavities and 5% in shallow cavities in the SE/SP group, and 35% in deep cavities, 16% in medium and 4% in shallow cavities in the TE group. Fisher's exact test showed the incidence of IPS was significantly higher in cases of deep (P< 0.05) and medium (P< 0.05) cavities. The test also revealed that in restorations placed with the SE/SP adhesive systems, the presence or absence of a protective liner or base made no significant difference in the IPS in medium and shallow cavities, while the use of such protective layers produced a significantly higher IPS (21%), compared with no protection (0%), in deep cavities (P< 0.05). The absence of protective liners or bases did not result in postoperative sensitivity in deep cavities, when the SE/SP dentin bonding systems were used.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15301216

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Dent        ISSN: 0894-8275            Impact factor:   1.522


  14 in total

1.  Plasma treatment of dentin surfaces for improving self-etching adhesive/dentin interface bonding.

Authors:  Xiaoqing Dong; Hao Li; Meng Chen; Yong Wang; Qingsong Yu
Journal:  Clin Plasma Med       Date:  2015-06-01

2.  Interfacial and surface characterization of two self-etching adhesive systems and a total-etch adhesive after bonding to ground and unground bovine enamel--a qualitative study.

Authors:  Gabriela Ibarra; Marcos A Vargas; Werner Geurtsen
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2006-11-21       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Does a new formula have an input in the clinical success of posterior composite restorations? A chat study.

Authors:  Sevil Gurgan; Uzay Koc Vural; Zeynep Bilge Kutuk; Filiz Yalcin Cakir
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Restoration variables and postoperative hypersensitivity in Class I restorations: PEARL Network findings. Part 2.

Authors:  Peter Blanchard; Ying Wong; Abigail G Matthews; Donald Vena; Ronald G Craig; Frederick A Curro; Van P Thompson
Journal:  Compend Contin Educ Dent       Date:  2013-04

Review 5.  Self-etching adhesives: possible new pulp capping agents to vital pulp therapy.

Authors:  Chun Cui; Xiu-Neng Zhou; Wei-Min Chen
Journal:  Front Med       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 4.592

6.  Postoperative hypersensitivity and its relationship to preparation variables in Class I resin-based composite restorations: findings from the practitioners engaged in applied research and learning (PEARL) Network. Part 1.

Authors:  Gary Berkowitz; Howard Spielman; Abigail Matthews; Donald Vena; Ronald Craig; Frederick Curro; Van Thompson
Journal:  Compend Contin Educ Dent       Date:  2013-03

7.  The effect of additional etching and curing mechanism of composite resin on the dentin bond strength.

Authors:  In-Su Lee; Sung-Ae Son; Bock Hur; Yong-Hoon Kwon; Jeong-Kil Park
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2013-11-28       Impact factor: 1.904

8.  Effect of additional etching and ethanol-wet bonding on the dentin bond strength of one-step self-etch adhesives.

Authors:  Joonghee Ahn; Kyoung-Hwa Jung; Sung-Ae Son; Bock Hur; Yong-Hoon Kwon; Jeong-Kil Park
Journal:  Restor Dent Endod       Date:  2014-11-18

9.  Nanofilled composite restorations with different adhesives strategies: clinical cases.

Authors:  Luana Dutra de Carvalho; Renata Gondo Machado; Guilherme Carpena Lopes; Mauro Caldeira de Andrada
Journal:  Case Rep Dent       Date:  2012-08-02

10.  Effect of EDTA Conditioning and Carbodiimide Pretreatment on the Bonding Performance of All-in-One Self-Etch Adhesives.

Authors:  Shipra Singh; Rajni Nagpal; Shashi Prabha Tyagi; Naveen Manuja
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2015-10-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.