Literature DB >> 1530116

Epidemiologic approach for cancer screening. Problems in design and analysis of trials.

P C Prorok1.   

Abstract

The goal of cancer screening is early detection and treatment of disease with a consequent reduction in mortality. The difficult task of evaluating whether a particular screening program can achieve this goal is the theme of this article. Our focus is on the two principal components of the screening process. The first component is the ability of the screening test to detect cancer early, while minimizing the number of false positive results. In this regard, the specificity of the test ordinarily must be very high, approaching 99%. The second component in the screening process is evaluating the overall impact of a screening program. For this, various study designs have been proposed. The best procedure, the randomized controlled trial, is discussed in detail, but alternative designs are also considered. The endpoint in any such study should be cancer-specific mortality. The problems inherent in other outcome variables, such as stage shift and increased length of survival due to lead time and length biases are addressed. Also considered are major difficulties in study design and evaluation, such as inadequate knowledge of the natural history of the disease, particularly of preclinical lesions. Key data items that should be collected for evaluation are listed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1530116     DOI: 10.1097/00043426-199205000-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Pediatr Hematol Oncol        ISSN: 0192-8562


  13 in total

1.  Surveillance for hepatocellular carcinoma in chronic hepatitis B virus infection: for whom.

Authors:  Jihyun An; Han Chu Lee
Journal:  Hepat Oncol       Date:  2015-07-28

Review 2.  Impact of survivorship-based research on defining clinical care guidelines.

Authors:  Melissa M Hudson; Wendy Landier; Patricia A Ganz
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 4.254

3.  Effect of breast self-examination techniques on the risk of death from breast cancer.

Authors:  B J Harvey; A B Miller; C J Baines; P N Corey
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1997-11-01       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 4.  Screening in liver disease.

Authors:  Paolo Del Poggio; Marzio Mazzoleni
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-09-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 5.  Clinical applications of squamous cell carcinoma antigen-immunoglobulins M to monitor chronic hepatitis C.

Authors:  Andrea Martini; Andrea Gallotta; Patrizia Pontisso; Giorgio Fassina
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2015-12-18

Review 6.  Surveillance for Wilms tumour in at-risk children: pragmatic recommendations for best practice.

Authors:  R H Scott; L Walker; Ø E Olsen; G Levitt; I Kenney; E Maher; C M Owens; K Pritchard-Jones; A Craft; N Rahman
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2006-07-20       Impact factor: 3.791

Review 7.  Changing Epidemiology of HCC: How to Screen and Identify Patients at Risk?

Authors:  Naomi Lange; Jean-François Dufour
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 3.199

8.  Bilateral disease and new trends in Wilms tumour.

Authors:  Catherine M Owens; Hervé J Brisse; Øystein E Olsen; Joanna Begent; Anne M Smets
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2007-11-17

9.  Diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Eldad S Bialecki; Adrian M Di Bisceglie
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.647

Review 10.  Surveillance for early diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: how best to do it?

Authors:  Edoardo G Giannini; Alessandro Cucchetti; Virginia Erroi; Francesca Garuti; Federica Odaldi; Franco Trevisani
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-12-21       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.