Literature DB >> 15300385

Antennal sucrose perception in the honey bee (Apis mellifera L.): behaviour and electrophysiology.

S Shuichi Haupt1.   

Abstract

Physiological mechanisms of antennal sucrose perception in the honey bee were analysed using behavioural and electrophysiological methods. Following sucrose stimulation of the tip of a freely moving antenna, the latency of proboscis extension was 320-340 ms, 80-100 ms after the first activity in muscle M17 controlling this response. When bees were allowed to actively touch a sucrose droplet with one antenna, contacts with the solution were frequent with durations of 10-20 ms and average intervals between contacts of approximately 40 ms. High sucrose concentrations led to short and frequent contacts. The proboscis response and M17 activity were largely independent of stimulus duration and temporal pattern. Taste hairs of the antennal tip displayed spike responses to sucrose concentrations down to at least 0.1%. The first 25 ms of the response were suitable for discrimination of sucrose concentrations. This time interval corresponds to the duration of naturally occurring gustatory stimuli. Sucrose responses between different hairs on the same antenna showed a high degree of variability, ranging from less than five to over 40 spikes per 0.5 s for a stimulus of 0.1% sucrose. This variability of receptor responses extends the dynamic range of sucrose perception over a large range of concentrations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15300385     DOI: 10.1007/s00359-004-0532-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol        ISSN: 0340-7594            Impact factor:   1.836


  24 in total

1.  Temporal coding of pheromone pulses and trains in Manduca sexta.

Authors:  F Marion-Poll; T R Tobin
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Physiology of a primary chemoreceptor unit.

Authors:  E S HODGSON; J Y LETTVIN; K D ROEDER
Journal:  Science       Date:  1955-09-02       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Electrophysiological responses of galeal contact chemoreceptors of Apis mellifera to selected sugars and electroylytes.

Authors:  A T Whitehead; J R Larsen
Journal:  J Insect Physiol       Date:  1976       Impact factor: 2.354

4.  Olfaction: responses of a decapod crustacean are enhanced by flicking.

Authors:  B C Schmitt; B W Ache
Journal:  Science       Date:  1979-07-13       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 5.  Learning and memory in honeybees: from behavior to neural substrates.

Authors:  R Menzel; U Muller
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 12.449

6.  The effect of genotype on response thresholds to sucrose and foraging behavior of honey bees (Apis mellifera L.).

Authors:  R E Page; J Erber; M K Fondrk
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 1.836

7.  Modification of potassium movement through the retina of the drone (Apis mellifera male) by glial uptake.

Authors:  J A Coles; R K Orkand
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Octopamine modulates the sensitivity of silkmoth pheromone receptor neurons.

Authors:  B Pophof
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 1.836

9.  The coelocapitular sensillum, an antennal hygro- and thermoreceptive sensillum of the honey bee, Apis mellifera L.

Authors:  F Yokohari
Journal:  Cell Tissue Res       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 5.249

10.  Antennal hygroreceptors of the honey bee, Apis mellifera L.

Authors:  F Yokohari; Y Tominaga; H Tateda
Journal:  Cell Tissue Res       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 5.249

View more
  17 in total

1.  The functions of antennal mechanoreceptors and antennal joints in tactile discrimination of the honeybee (Apis mellifera L.).

Authors:  Ricarda Scheiner; Susanne Schnitt; Joachim Erber
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2005-09-13       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Appetitive odor learning does not change olfactory coding in a subpopulation of honeybee antennal lobe neurons.

Authors:  P Peele; M Ditzen; R Menzel; C G Galizia
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2006-07-25       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Sucrose acceptance, discrimination and proboscis responses of honey bees (Apis mellifera L.) in the field and the laboratory.

Authors:  Samir Mujagic; Joachim Erber
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2009-01-16       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Behavioral studies on tarsal gustation in honeybees: sucrose responsiveness and sucrose-mediated olfactory conditioning.

Authors:  Maria Gabriela de Brito Sanchez; Chun Chen; Jianjun Li; Fanglin Liu; Monique Gauthier; Martin Giurfa
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 5.  Behavioral and neural analysis of associative learning in the honeybee: a taste from the magic well.

Authors:  Martin Giurfa
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2007-07-17       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  Central gustatory projections and side-specificity of operant antennal muscle conditioning in the honeybee.

Authors:  S Shuichi Haupt
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2007-01-31       Impact factor: 2.389

7.  Electrophysiology of scorpion PEG sensilla.

Authors:  Elizabeth D Knowlton; Douglas D Gaffin
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 1.355

8.  Selenium toxicity to honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) pollinators: effects on behaviors and survival.

Authors:  Kristen R Hladun; Brian H Smith; Julie A Mustard; Ray R Morton; John T Trumble
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-13       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Olfactory interference during inhibitory backward pairing in honey bees.

Authors:  Matthieu Dacher; Brian H Smith
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-10-23       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Does an insect's unconditioned response to sucrose reveal expectations of reward?

Authors:  Mariana Gil; Randolf Menzel; Rodrigo J De Marco
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-07-30       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.