AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: We examined whether diabetic background retinopathy is associated with reduced coronary vasoreactivity in people with Type 1 diabetes. METHODS: A total of 21 men with Type 1 diabetes were investigated, including 9 men with background retinopathy and 12 men without retinopathy. In addition, 12 non-diabetic, age-matched subjects were studied. All subjects were non-smokers, otherwise healthy and had no other diabetic complications. Resting myocardial blood flow and hyperaemic dipyridamole-stimulated flow (dipyridamole, 0.56 mg/kg during a 4-min period), a measure of coronary vasoreactivity, were measured during euglycaemic hyperinsulinaemic clamp (1 mU x kg(-1) x min(-1)) using positron emission tomography and oxygen-15-labelled water. RESULTS: Resting myocardial blood flow (0.82 +/- 0.13 vs 0.96 +/- 0.23 vs 0.88 +/- 0.25 ml x g(-1) x min(-1), with vs without retinopathy vs non-diabetic subjects) and coronary vascular resistance (111.2 +/- 23.4 vs 95.5 +/- 15.8 vs 101.9 +/- 31.5 mmHg x min x g x ml(-1) respectively) were not significantly different between the groups. Dipyridamole infusion induced an increase in blood flow and a decrease in coronary vascular resistance in all study subjects (p<0.001). However, dipyridamole-stimulated flow and coronary vascular resistance were blunted in diabetic patients with retinopathy (2.9 +/- 0.9 ml x g(-1) x min(-1) and 34.1 +/- 11.3 mmHg x min x g x ml(-1)) when compared to diabetic patients without retinopathy (4.0 +/- 1.3 ml x g(-1) x min(-1), p=0.04 and 24.6 +/- 7.5 mmHg x min x g x ml(-1), p=0.03) or non-diabetic subjects (4.5 +/- 1.4 ml x g(-1) x min(-1) p=0.008 and 22.2 +/- 8.7 mmHg x min x g x ml(-1), p=0.01). Myocardial flow reserve was impaired in diabetic patients with retinopathy (3.6 +/- 1.0) when compared to non-diabetic subjects (5.3 +/- 1.9, p=0.02) but not significantly reduced when compared to diabetic patients without retinopathy (4.2 +/- 1.4, p=0.2). CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION: Diabetic background retinopathy appears to be associated with impaired coronary vasoreactivity in young people with Type 1 diabetes.
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: We examined whether diabetic background retinopathy is associated with reduced coronary vasoreactivity in people with Type 1 diabetes. METHODS: A total of 21 men with Type 1 diabetes were investigated, including 9 men with background retinopathy and 12 men without retinopathy. In addition, 12 non-diabetic, age-matched subjects were studied. All subjects were non-smokers, otherwise healthy and had no other diabetic complications. Resting myocardial blood flow and hyperaemic dipyridamole-stimulated flow (dipyridamole, 0.56 mg/kg during a 4-min period), a measure of coronary vasoreactivity, were measured during euglycaemic hyperinsulinaemic clamp (1 mU x kg(-1) x min(-1)) using positron emission tomography and oxygen-15-labelled water. RESULTS: Resting myocardial blood flow (0.82 +/- 0.13 vs 0.96 +/- 0.23 vs 0.88 +/- 0.25 ml x g(-1) x min(-1), with vs without retinopathy vs non-diabetic subjects) and coronary vascular resistance (111.2 +/- 23.4 vs 95.5 +/- 15.8 vs 101.9 +/- 31.5 mmHg x min x g x ml(-1) respectively) were not significantly different between the groups. Dipyridamole infusion induced an increase in blood flow and a decrease in coronary vascular resistance in all study subjects (p<0.001). However, dipyridamole-stimulated flow and coronary vascular resistance were blunted in diabeticpatients with retinopathy (2.9 +/- 0.9 ml x g(-1) x min(-1) and 34.1 +/- 11.3 mmHg x min x g x ml(-1)) when compared to diabeticpatients without retinopathy (4.0 +/- 1.3 ml x g(-1) x min(-1), p=0.04 and 24.6 +/- 7.5 mmHg x min x g x ml(-1), p=0.03) or non-diabetic subjects (4.5 +/- 1.4 ml x g(-1) x min(-1) p=0.008 and 22.2 +/- 8.7 mmHg x min x g x ml(-1), p=0.01). Myocardial flow reserve was impaired in diabeticpatients with retinopathy (3.6 +/- 1.0) when compared to non-diabetic subjects (5.3 +/- 1.9, p=0.02) but not significantly reduced when compared to diabeticpatients without retinopathy (4.2 +/- 1.4, p=0.2). CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION:Diabetic background retinopathy appears to be associated with impaired coronary vasoreactivity in young people with Type 1 diabetes.
Authors: M F Di Carli; D Bianco-Batlles; M E Landa; A Kazmers; H Groehn; O Muzik; G Grunberger Journal: Circulation Date: 1999-08-24 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: T Janatuinen; R Laaksonen; R Vesalainen; O Raitakari; T Lehtimäki; P Nuutila; J Knuuti Journal: J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Date: 2001-10 Impact factor: 3.105
Authors: M J Stevens; F Dayanikli; D M Raffel; K C Allman; T Sandford; E L Feldman; D M Wieland; J Corbett; M Schwaiger Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 1998-06 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: H Laine; O T Raitakari; H Niinikoski; O P Pitkänen; H Iida; J Viikari; P Nuutila; J Knuuti Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 1998-07 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Daniel S Feuer; Eileen M Handberg; Borna Mehrad; Janet Wei; C Noel Bairey Merz; Carl J Pepine; Ellen C Keeley Journal: Am J Med Date: 2022-04-23 Impact factor: 5.928
Authors: Emilie H Zobel; Signe A Winther; Philip Hasbak; Bernt J von Scholten; Lene Holmvang; Andreas Kjaer; Peter Rossing; Tine W Hansen Journal: Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2019-07-01 Impact factor: 6.875