Literature DB >> 15297851

Antiphospholipid antibodies in lymphoma: prevalence and clinical significance.

Simona Pusterla1, Sara Previtali, Stefana Marziali, Sergio Cortelazzo, Andrea Rossi, Tiziano Barbui, Monica Galli.   

Abstract

To evaluate whether the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies in lymphoma patients influences their response to treatment, and their rate of thromboembolic complications, we followed up 100 consecutive patients with different lymphomas, who underwent measurement of lupus anticoagulants and anticardiolipin antibodies at diagnosis. In all, 27 patients had lupus anticoagulants and/or anticardiolipin antibodies. This prevalence was significantly higher than in a group of 100 age- and sex-matched normal control subjects (8%; P=0.0008, odds ratio 4.25, 95% confidence interval, 1.82-9.92). At diagnosis, antiphospholipid-positive and -negative patients were similar with respect to age, sex, type and staging of lymphomas. During follow-up, the rate of thrombosis was significantly higher in patients with (5.1% patients/year) than without (0.75% patients/year) antiphospholipid antibodies. The two groups were similar with respect to relapse and death rate. In conclusion, antiphospholipid antibodies are associated with lymphomas. Their determination is useful to identify patients at high risk to develop thrombotic complications, but not to predict treatment outcome or disease prognosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15297851     DOI: 10.1038/sj.thj.6200377

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hematol J        ISSN: 1466-4860


  11 in total

1.  High titres of IgM-antiphospholipid antibodies are unrelated to pathogenicity in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Authors:  W Miesbach; I Scharrer; R A Asherson
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2006-05-24       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 2.  Primary anetoderma and antiphospholipid antibodies--review of the literature.

Authors:  Emmilia Hodak; Michael David
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy Immunol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 8.667

3.  Diffuse large cell lymphoma presenting as a sacral mass and lupus anticoagulant.

Authors:  Lilangi S Ediriwickrema; Wajih Zaheer
Journal:  Yale J Biol Med       Date:  2011-12

Review 4.  Catastrophic APS in the context of other thrombotic microangiopathies.

Authors:  Ignasi Rodríguez-Pintó; Gerard Espinosa; Ricard Cervera
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 4.592

Review 5.  Malignancies and catastrophic anti-phospholipid syndrome.

Authors:  Wolfgang Miesbach
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy Immunol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 8.667

6.  Autoantibodies against the fibrinolytic receptor, annexin 2, in antiphospholipid syndrome.

Authors:  Gabriela Cesarman-Maus; Nina P Ríos-Luna; Arunkumar B Deora; Bihui Huang; Rosario Villa; Maria del Carmen Cravioto; Donato Alarcón-Segovia; Jorge Sánchez-Guerrero; Katherine A Hajjar
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2006-02-21       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 7.  Antiphospholipid syndrome and cancer.

Authors:  Eyal Reinstein; Yehuda Shoenfeld
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy Immunol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 8.667

8.  The role of malignancies in patients with catastrophic anti-phospholipid (Asherson's) syndrome.

Authors:  W Miesbach; R A Asherson; R Cervera; Y Shoenfeld; J Gomez Puerta; G Espinosa; S Bucciarelli
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2007-05-24       Impact factor: 2.980

9.  High Incidence of Antiphospholipid Antibodies in Newly Diagnosed Patients With Lymphoma and a Proposed aPL Predictive Score.

Authors:  Smith Kungwankiattichai; Yupa Nakkinkun; Weerapat Owattanapanich; Theera Ruchutrakool
Journal:  Clin Appl Thromb Hemost       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 2.389

Review 10.  Epidemiology of Antiphospholipid Syndrome in the General Population.

Authors:  Jesse Y Dabit; Maria O Valenzuela-Almada; Sebastian Vallejo-Ramos; Alí Duarte-García
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2022-01-05       Impact factor: 4.592

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.