Literature DB >> 15297586

Hepatic arterial port systems for treatment of liver metastases: factors affecting patency and adverse events.

Jens Ricke1, Bert Hildebrandt, Alexandra Miersch, Annett Nicolaou, Guesjal Warschewske, Ulf Teichgräber, Enrique Lopez Hänninen, Hanno Riess, Roland Felix.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the outcome of interventional hepatic arterial port placement in a prospective phase II trial.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: One-hundred five consecutive patients were included in this study. Primary endpoint was port patency; secondary endpoints were complications, toxicity, response, and progression free and overall survival. Seventy-eight patients presented with liver metastasis only, 6 patients had additional minor extrahepatic disease, and 21 patients had no evidence of disease after liver resection, laser-induced thermotherapy, or computed tomography (CT)-guided interstitial brachytherapy of liver metastasis. Exclusive access route was the femoral artery. Subgroup analysis compared either 4-F catheters (n = 58) to 2.2-F (n = 33) and 2.7-F (n = 20) microcatheters or different strategies in anatomic variants of the celiac branch: neglect (n = 10) or embolization of minor hepatic feeders (n = 11), splenic arterial port (n = 8), double port (n = 7).
RESULTS: Technical success was 99%. Assisted port patency after 6 months was 93%. Complications demanding port revisions were significantly lower in patients receiving 4-F versus 2.2-F and 2.7-F systems (P <.001), with disconnection as the major problem with use of microcatheters. Hepatic artery thrombosis occurred in 10 patients (9%), with successful lysis in two patients. With use of 4-F and 2.2-F catheters, there was no difference with respect to catheter occlusion or hepatic thrombosis. No differences were noted in complications or outcome applying four different strategies in celiac branch variants. In a subgroup of patients receiving folinic acid/5-fluorouracil (170 mg/600 mg; 10% dose escalation per cycle) for 5 days every 4 weeks only 15% experienced Grade 3 toxicity. Patients with liver metastasis and salvage therapy demonstrated progression-free survival of 63% after 6 months and a median survival of 16 months.
CONCLUSION: Interventional placement of hepatic arterial port systems may overcome frequent hepatic arterial chemotherapy failures as encountered in all published major trials on hepatic arterial infusion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15297586     DOI: 10.1097/01.RVI.0000136992.96374.60

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol        ISSN: 1051-0443            Impact factor:   3.464


  11 in total

1.  Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy with a coaxial reservoir system using a non-braided spiral tip microcatheter.

Authors:  Masamichi Koganemaru; Toshi Abe; Ryoji Iwamoto; Masaaki Nonoshita; Seigo Yoshida; Daiji Uchiyama; Naofumi Hayabuchi
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 2.374

2.  The Precision of Hepatic Arterial Infusion Scintigraphy as a Quantitative Biomarker of Tumor Microvasculature.

Authors:  Mark Dunphy; Neeta Pandit-Taskar; Josef J Fox; Nancy Kemeny
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Fusion imaging using a hybrid SPECT-CT camera improves port perfusion scintigraphy for control of hepatic arterial infusion of chemotherapy in colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Timm Denecke; Bert Hildebrandt; Lukas Lehmkuhl; Nils Peters; Annett Nicolaou; Maciej Pech; Hanno Riess; Jens Ricke; Roland Felix; Holger Amthauer
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2005-04-22       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  Hepatic arterial infusion with oxaliplatin and 5-FU/folinic acid for advanced biliary tract cancer: a phase II study.

Authors:  M Sinn; A Nicolaou; B Gebauer; P Podrabsky; D Seehofer; J Ricke; B Dörken; H Riess; B Hildebrandt
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2013-03-24       Impact factor: 3.199

5.  Extensive Use of Interventional Therapies Improves Survival in Unresectable or Recurrent Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Ricarda Seidensticker; Max Seidensticker; Kathleen Doegen; Konrad Mohnike; Kerstin Schütte; Patrick Stübs; Erika Kettner; Maciej Pech; Holger Amthauer; Jens Ricke
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 2.260

Review 6.  [Update on chemoinfusion and chemoembolization treatments].

Authors:  A Lubienski; M Simon; K Lubienski; J Gellissen; R-T Hoffmann; T F Jakobs; T Helmberger
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 0.803

7.  Interventionally implanted port catheter systems for hepatic arterial infusion of chemotherapy in patients with colorectal liver metastases: a Phase II-study and historical comparison with the surgical approach.

Authors:  Bert Hildebrandt; Maciej Pech; Annett Nicolaou; Jan M Langrehr; Jacek Kurcz; Birgit Bartels; Alexandra Miersch; Roland Felix; Peter Neuhaus; Hanno Riess; Bernd Dörken; Jens Ricke
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2007-04-24       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 8.  Is There Any Evidence for a Role of Local Treatment in Cholangiocarcinoma?

Authors:  Arndt Vogel; Oliver Dudeck
Journal:  Viszeralmedizin       Date:  2014-08

9.  Interventionally implanted port catheter systems for hepatic arterial infusion of chemotherapy in patients with primary liver cancer: a phase II-study (NCT00356161).

Authors:  Marianne Sinn; Annett Nicolaou; Jens Ricke; Pjotr Podrabsky; Daniel Seehofer; Bernhard Gebauer; Maciej Pech; Peter Neuhaus; Bernd Dörken; Hanno Riess; Bert Hildebrandt
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-08-09       Impact factor: 3.067

10.  Isolated hepatic artery thrombosis leading to multiple liver infarcts in a non-transplant patient.

Authors:  Tarek Almouradi; Paul Co; William Riles; Bashar Attar
Journal:  Am J Case Rep       Date:  2014-09-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.