Literature DB >> 15296904

Comparative analysis of T2 selective division of rami-communicantes (ramicotomy) with T2 sympathetic clipping in the treatment of craniofacial hyperhidrosis.

Do Hyung Kim1, Hyo Chae Paik, Doo Yun Lee.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The main cause of dissatisfaction after sympathetic trunk blocking surgery (T2 sympathectomy, sympathetic clipping) for craniofacial hyperhidrosis is compensatory sweating. Preserving sympathetic trunk may decrease the incidence of compensatory sweating, and we introduce T2 ramicotomy, which may better preserve the sympathetic nerve trunk in order to reduce compensatory sweating.
METHODS: From January 2000 to November 2002, video-assisted thoracoscopic (VAT) T2 sympathetic clipping and VAT ramicotomy were performed in 44 patients suffering from craniofacial hyperhidrosis. Twenty-two patients underwent T2 sympathetic clipping (group 1), and 22 underwent division of T2 rami-communicantes (group 2). We retrospectively analyzed the rate of satisfaction, dryness of face, and grade of compensatory sweating.
RESULTS: Both groups were similar with respect to facial dryness (P = 0.099). Group 1: excessive dry 5 patients (22.7%), dry 17 patients (77.3%); group 2: excessive dry 3 patients (13.6%), dry 15 patients (68.1%), and persistent sweating 4 patients (18.3%). The rate of satisfaction was 77.3% in group 1, and 63.6% in group 2 with no significant difference (P > 0.05). The rate of compensatory sweating in group 2 (72.7%) was significantly lower than in group 1 (95.4%) (P < 0.039). The chance of embarrassing and disabling compensatory sweating was lower in group 2 than in group 1; 76.5% (embarrassing in 8 patients, disabling in 9) in group 1, and 36.4% (embarrassing in 7 patients, disabling in 1) in group 2 which was statistically significant (P < 0.006).
CONCLUSIONS: T2 ramicotomy for craniofacial hyperhidrosis lowers the rate of compensatory sweating and excessive dryness of face compared to T2 clipping.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15296904     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2004.04.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg        ISSN: 1010-7940            Impact factor:   4.191


  6 in total

1.  The role of surgical treatment of hyperhidrosis.

Authors:  Mark J Krasna
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 7.616

Review 2.  Thoracic sympathectomy: a review of current indications.

Authors:  Moshe Hashmonai; Alan E P Cameron; Peter B Licht; Chris Hensman; Christoph H Schick
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-06-27       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Long-term results of oxybutynin use in treating facial hyperhidrosis.

Authors:  Nelson Wolosker; Marcelo Passos Teivelis; Mariana Krutman; Taiz Pereira Dozono de Almeida Campbell; Paulo Kauffman; José Ribas de Campos; Pedro Puech-Leão
Journal:  An Bras Dermatol       Date:  2014 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.896

Review 4.  The correlation between the method of sympathetic ablation for palmar hyperhidrosis and the occurrence of compensatory hyperhidrosis: a review.

Authors:  Doron Kopelman; Moshe Hashmonai
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Effect of botulinum toxin in stellate ganglion for craniofacial hyperhidrosis: a case report.

Authors:  Jung Hyun Park; Rip Kim; Sang Hoon Na; So Young Kwon
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 1.671

6.  A comparison between two types of limited sympathetic surgery for palmar hyperhidrosis.

Authors:  Jung Joo Hwang; Do Hyung Kim; Yoon Joo Hong; Doo Yun Lee
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2012-07-15       Impact factor: 2.549

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.