Literature DB >> 15296815

Adjustment for baseline measurement error in randomized controlled trials induces bias.

Siew F Chan1, Petra Macaskill, Les Irwig, Stephen D Walter.   

Abstract

When estimating the treatment effect in a randomized controlled trial, it is common to have a continuous outcome which is also observed at baseline. These observations are often prone to measurement error, for example due to within-patient variability. Controversy exists in the literature about whether baseline measurement error should be adjusted for in this context. Computer simulations were used to compare the biases in the estimated treatment effect, with and without adjusting for measurement error, and for different levels of observed baseline imbalance. The impacts of sample size (30 per group and 300 per group) and reliability coefficient (0.6, 0.8 and 1) were also assessed. The results show that in randomized controlled trials, the ordinary least squares (OLS) estimator without adjusting for measurement error is unbiased. On the contrary, adjusting for measurement error leads to bias, especially when sample sizes are small and/or measurement error is large. The treatment effect adjusting for measurement error is on average overestimated when the baseline mean of the control group is larger than that of the treated group. It is underestimated when the control group has a smaller baseline mean.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15296815     DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2004.06.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Control Clin Trials        ISSN: 0197-2456


  6 in total

1.  Concerning Sichieri R, Cunha DB: Obes Facts 2014;7:221–232. The Assertion that Controlling for Baseline (Pre-Randomization) Covariates in Randomized Controlled Trials Leads to Bias is False.

Authors:  Peng Li; Andrew W Brown; John A Dawson; Kathryn A Kaiser; Michelle M Bohan Brown; Scott W Keith; J Michael Oakes; David B Allison
Journal:  Obes Facts       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 3.942

2.  Assessing the Relationship between the Baseline Value of a Continuous Variable and Subsequent Change Over Time.

Authors:  Arnaud Chiolero; Gilles Paradis; Benjamin Rich; James A Hanley
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2013-08-23

3.  Effectiveness of a randomized school-based intervention involving families and teachers to prevent excessive weight gain among adolescents in Brazil.

Authors:  Diana B Cunha; Bárbara da S N de Souza; Rosangela A Pereira; Rosely Sichieri
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-25       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Empirical comparison of four baseline covariate adjustment methods in analysis of continuous outcomes in randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Shiyuan Zhang; James Paul; Manyat Nantha-Aree; Norman Buckley; Uswa Shahzad; Ji Cheng; Justin DeBeer; Mitchell Winemaker; David Wismer; Dinshaw Punthakee; Victoria Avram; Lehana Thabane
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2014-07-14       Impact factor: 4.790

Review 5.  Unbalanced baseline in school-based interventions to prevent obesity: adjustment can lead to bias - a systematic review.

Authors:  Rosely Sichieri; Diana Barbosa Cunha
Journal:  Obes Facts       Date:  2014-06-28       Impact factor: 3.942

6.  Different ways to estimate treatment effects in randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  Twisk J; Bosman L; Hoekstra T; Rijnhart J; Welten M; Heymans M
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials Commun       Date:  2018-03-28
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.