| Literature DB >> 15296318 |
Valérie Maeder1, Beate I Escher, Martin Scheringer, Konrad Hungerbühler.
Abstract
Persistence, bioconcentration, and toxicity (PBT) are important hazardous properties of organic chemicals. In PBT assessments, it is desirable that the three criteria P, B, and T are independent. However, this requirement is not fulfilled if an aqueous lethal concentration (LC50) is used as T indicator because LC50 includes both bioconcentration and intrinsic toxicity. Indicators for intrinsic toxicity such asthe internal lethal concentration (ILC) are independent of a chemical's bioconcentration potential. However, ILC50 data are scarce and difficult to measure. Therefore, the toxic ratio (TR) is proposed here as an alternative. TR is defined as the ratio of a chemical's LC50 estimated from a QSAR for baseline toxicity and the experimental LC50 value. TR can also be interpreted as a measure of the ILC relative to the ILC for baseline toxicity. A TR of 10 separates specifically toxic chemicals from baseline toxicants. With some 800 chemicals, the practicability of classifying chemicals in terms of TR is demonstrated. Employing TR as toxicity indicator leads to different T scores for 30% of the chemicals studied. The baseline toxicity of hydrophobic compounds with TR < 10 does not receive a high T score but is still indicated by a high B score. The toxicity of specifically toxic hydrophilic substances is given additional emphasis by high TR values. These classification changes require that the interpretation of the B and T dimensions in PBT assessments is redefined.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2004 PMID: 15296318 DOI: 10.1021/es0351591
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Environ Sci Technol ISSN: 0013-936X Impact factor: 9.028