Literature DB >> 15295370

Labor induction in women with an unfavorable Bishop score: randomized controlled trial of intrauterine Foley catheter with concurrent oxytocin infusion versus Foley catheter with extra-amniotic saline infusion with concurrent oxytocin infusion.

Debra A Guinn1, Jill K Davies, Richard O Jones, Lisa Sullivan, Douglas Wolf.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study was undertaken to determine whether the addition of extra-amniotic saline infusion improves the efficacy of the Foley catheter in women undergoing cervical ripening and induction of labor with an unfavorable cervical examination. STUDY
DESIGN: One hundred consenting women with a Bishop score less than 5 with singleton gestation, intact membranes, vertex presentation, who required induction of labor were randomly assigned to 2 groups: Foley alone (Foley, n=49) or to the Foley catheter with extra-amniotic saline infusion (EASI, 30 mL of NS per hour infused through the distal port of the Foley, n=51). All women received concurrent dilute oxytocin infusion per protocol. The primary analysis was intent to treat. Nonparametric tests were used as indicated.
RESULTS: At randomization, the groups were well balanced for potential confounders including: parity, gestational age, prior cesarean delivery, preeclampsia, mean dilation, effacement, and Bishop score. There were no differences between the groups for time to delivery (Foley 17.7 +/- 10.5 hours vs EASI 17.4 +/- 11.7 hours, P=.9), the proportion of women delivered before 24 hours (Foley 41/49 [84%] vs EASI 39/51 [77%], P=.37) or cesarean rates (Foley 9/49 [17.7%] vs EASI 9/51 [18.4%], P=.92). There were also no differences in complications, including chorioamnionitis, endometritis, and neonatal morbidity.
CONCLUSION: EASI does not increase the efficacy of cervical ripening and induction of labor with a Foley catheter and concurrent oxytocin infusion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15295370     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2003.12.039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  5 in total

1.  Foley catheter for induction of labor: potential barriers to adopting the technique.

Authors:  R K Edwards; J M Szychowski; A V Bodea-Braescu; J R Biggio; M G Lin
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 2.521

2.  A simplified cervix model in response to induction balloon in pre-labour.

Authors:  James Andrew Smith
Journal:  Theor Biol Med Model       Date:  2013-09-26       Impact factor: 2.432

Review 3.  Mechanical methods for induction of labour.

Authors:  Marieke Dt de Vaan; Mieke Lg Ten Eikelder; Marta Jozwiak; Kirsten R Palmer; Miranda Davies-Tuck; Kitty Wm Bloemenkamp; Ben Willem J Mol; Michel Boulvain
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-10-18

4.  Balloon dilators for labor induction: a historical review.

Authors:  James Andrew Smith
Journal:  J Med Ethics Hist Med       Date:  2013-11-03

5.  A randomized controlled trial of foley catheter, extra-amniotic saline infusion and prostaglandin e2 suppository for labor induction.

Authors:  Mandana Mansour Ghanaie; Mina Jafarabadi; Forozan Milani; Seyed Alaedin Asgary; Morteza Fallah Karkan
Journal:  J Family Reprod Health       Date:  2013-06
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.