Literature DB >> 15295361

Determinants of patient satisfaction after the tension-free vaginal tape procedure.

Tracie L Davis1, Emily S Lukacz, Karl M Luber, Charles W Nager.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to compare patient satisfaction with subjective and objective measures of success. STUDY
DESIGN: Satisfaction at 1-year was measured by using a self-administered written questionnaire. Success was assessed both subjectively and objectively by using the short form Urogenital Distress Inventory, stress testing, and multichannel urodynamics. Outcomes were compared to determine the relationship between satisfaction and success. Satisfied and dissatisfied patients were compared with respect to pre-, intra-, peri-, and postoperative characteristics. Student t and chi(2) tests were used for continuous and ordinal data, respectively.
RESULTS: Of 66 (80%) patients, 53 were satisfied. These patients were more likely to achieve subjective cure (91% vs 62%, P=.009) but not statistically more likely to be objectively cured (92% vs 75%, P=.08). Dissatisfied patients tended to have overactive bladder symptoms, voiding difficulty, and required sling release. Other patient characteristics did not influence satisfaction rates.
CONCLUSION: Satisfaction after tension-free vaginal tape procedure is highly dependent on normal bladder function. Dissatisfied patients deserve comprehensive evaluation, although objective measures may not reflect patient satisfaction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15295361     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.03.085

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  12 in total

1.  Mixed incontinence: comparing definitions in non-surgical patients.

Authors:  Linda Brubaker; Emily S Lukacz; Kathryn Burgio; Philippe Zimmern; Peggy Norton; Wendy Leng; Harry Johnson; Stephen Kraus; Anne Stoddard
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 2.696

2.  Pathophysiology of sexual dysfunction as related to pelvic floor disorders.

Authors:  Lone Mouritsen
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2009-05

3.  New minimally invasive slings: TVT Secur.

Authors:  Stephanie M Molden; Vincent R Lucente
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.092

4.  Overactive bladder after sling surgery.

Authors:  Kamran P Sajadi; Sandip P Vasavada
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.092

5.  Functional Outcomes for Incontinence and Prolapse Surgery.

Authors:  Saya Segal; Lily A Arya; Ariana L Smith
Journal:  Curr Bladder Dysfunct Rep       Date:  2012-09

6.  Factors predictive of outcome in tension-free vaginal tape procedure for urinary stress incontinence in a teaching hospital.

Authors:  Hendrik Cammu; Elke Van Den Abbeele; Hellen Nagel; Patrick Haentjens
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2009-03-10

7.  Surgical versus nonsurgical treatment of women with pelvic floor dysfunction: patient centered goals at 1 year.

Authors:  Kathie L Hullfish; Viktor E Bovbjerg; Matthew J Gurka; William D Steers
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Goal achievement as a patient-generated outcome measure for stress urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Jill L Milne; Magali Robert; Selphee Tang; Neil Drummond; Sue Ross
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.377

9.  Patient recall 6 weeks after surgical consent for midurethral sling using mesh.

Authors:  Brook L McFadden; Melissa L Constantine; Sarah L Hammil; Megan E Tarr; Husam T Abed; Kimberly S Kenton; Vivian W Sung; Rebecca G Rogers
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-07-02       Impact factor: 2.894

10.  Race and satisfaction in general OB/GYN clinics.

Authors:  James E Rohrer; Jon D Lund; Susan Goldfarb
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2005-05-12       Impact factor: 2.809

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.