Literature DB >> 15295243

Activated charcoal administration in a pediatric emergency department.

Kevin C Osterhoudt1, Elizabeth R Alpern, Dennis Durbin, Frances Nadel, Fred M Henretig.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Activated charcoal is the commonest form of gastrointestinal decontamination offered to potentially poisoned children within United States emergency departments. Our aim was to describe this practice with regard to timing, route of administration, use of flavoring agents, and occurrence of adverse events other than vomiting.
METHODS: Descriptive data were prospectively collected from consecutive administrations of single-dose activated charcoal, within an urban, academic pediatric emergency department, over a period of 2.5 years.
RESULTS: Two hundred seventy-five subjects were enrolled. The median time elapsed between ingestion and emergency department arrival was 1.2 hours. Although 55% of children were administered charcoal within 1 hour of emergency department presentation, only 7.8% received charcoal within 1 hour of poisoning exposure. Forty-four percent of children younger than 6 years, 50% of 6-year to 12-year olds, and 89% of 12-year to 18-year olds drank the charcoal voluntarily (P < 0.01). Medical staff chose not to offer charcoal orally to 42 asymptomatic children among the 176 subjects under the age of 6 years. Of the 114 young children offered oral charcoal, 36 (32%) refused or were intolerant. Nurses added flavoring agents to the charcoal in 59% of oral administrations, but this act did not enhance observed palatability. Among children younger than 6 years, the median time from first sip to complete ingestion of charcoal slurry was 15 minutes. One pulmonary aspiration event and a case of constipation were noted.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite published guidelines, children treated in an emergency department rarely received charcoal within 1 hour of ingestion. Gastric tube administration of charcoal varies by age and is partly subjective in its application. We found no evidence that excipient flavoring of charcoal improved success of administration. Pulmonary aspiration of charcoal, although uncommon, should be considered when assessing the risk of therapy. We offer a report of symptomatic constipation from single-dose charcoal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15295243     DOI: 10.1097/01.pec.0000136064.14704.d1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Emerg Care        ISSN: 0749-5161            Impact factor:   1.454


  5 in total

1.  Clinical Guidelines for Diagnosis and Treatment of Botulism, 2021.

Authors:  Agam K Rao; Jeremy Sobel; Kevin Chatham-Stephens; Carolina Luquez
Journal:  MMWR Recomm Rep       Date:  2021-05-07

2.  Gastrointestinal decontamination in the acutely poisoned patient.

Authors:  Timothy E Albertson; Kelly P Owen; Mark E Sutter; Andrew L Chan
Journal:  Int J Emerg Med       Date:  2011-10-12

3.  Single dose activated charcoal for gut decontamination: Application by medical non-professionals -a prospective study on availability and practicability.

Authors:  Rudolf Pfab; Sabrina Schmoll; Gabriele Dostal; Jochen Stenzel; Alexander Hapfelmeier; Florian Eyer
Journal:  Toxicol Rep       Date:  2016-12-31

Review 4.  Activated charcoal for acute poisoning: one toxicologist's journey.

Authors:  Kent R Olson
Journal:  J Med Toxicol       Date:  2010-06

5.  Health-related quality of life in dialysis patients with constipation: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Jisheng Zhang; Congyang Huang; Yanli Li; Jun Chen; Fangyuan Shen; Qiang Yao; Jiaqi Qian; Beiyan Bao; Xuping Yao
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 2.711

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.