Literature DB >> 15292165

Hairpin structure-forming propensity of the (CCTG.CAGG) tetranucleotide repeats contributes to the genetic instability associated with myotonic dystrophy type 2.

Ruhee Dere1, Marek Napierala, Laura P W Ranum, Robert D Wells.   

Abstract

The genetic instabilities of (CCTG.CAGG)(n) tetranucleotide repeats were investigated to evaluate the molecular mechanisms responsible for the massive expansions found in myotonic dystrophy type 2 (DM2) patients. DM2 is caused by an expansion of the repeat from the normal allele of 26 to as many as 11,000 repeats. Genetic expansions and deletions were monitored in an African green monkey kidney cell culture system (COS-7 cells) as a function of the length (30, 114, or 200 repeats), orientation, or proximity of the repeat tracts to the origin (SV40) of replication. As found for CTG.CAG repeats related to DM1, the instabilities were greater for the longer tetranucleotide repeat tracts. Also, the expansions and deletions predominated when cloned in orientation II (CAGG on the leading strand template) rather than I and when cloned proximal rather than distal to the replication origin. Biochemical studies on synthetic d(CAGG)(26) and d(CCTG)(26) as models of unpaired regions of the replication fork revealed that d(CAGG)(26) has a marked propensity to adopt a defined base paired hairpin structure, whereas the complementary d(CCTG)(26) lacks this capacity. The effect of orientation described above differs from all previous results with three triplet repeat sequences (including CTG.CAG), which are also involved in the etiologies of other hereditary neurological diseases. However, similar to the triplet repeat sequences, the ability of one of the two strands to form a more stable folded structure, in our case the CAGG strand, explains this unorthodox "reversed" behavior.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15292165     DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M406415200

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  26 in total

Review 1.  Myotonic dystrophy: disease repeat range, penetrance, age of onset, and relationship between repeat size and phenotypes.

Authors:  Kevin Yum; Eric T Wang; Auinash Kalsotra
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 5.578

Review 2.  On the wrong DNA track: Molecular mechanisms of repeat-mediated genome instability.

Authors:  Alexandra N Khristich; Sergei M Mirkin
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 3.  Telomere and Subtelomere R-loops and Antigenic Variation in Trypanosomes.

Authors:  Arpita Saha; Vishal P Nanavaty; Bibo Li
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2019-11-02       Impact factor: 5.469

4.  Reduction of toxic RNAs in myotonic dystrophies type 1 and type 2 by the RNA helicase p68/DDX5.

Authors:  Karlie Jones; Christina Wei; Benedikt Schoser; Giovanni Meola; Nikolai Timchenko; Lubov Timchenko
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-06-15       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  A Z-DNA sequence reduces slipped-strand structure formation in the myotonic dystrophy type 2 (CCTG) x (CAGG) repeat.

Authors:  Sharon F Edwards; Mario Sirito; Ralf Krahe; Richard R Sinden
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-02-13       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  MBNL binds similar RNA structures in the CUG repeats of myotonic dystrophy and its pre-mRNA substrate cardiac troponin T.

Authors:  M Bryan Warf; J Andrew Berglund
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2007-10-17       Impact factor: 4.942

7.  A fly model for the CCUG-repeat expansion of myotonic dystrophy type 2 reveals a novel interaction with MBNL1.

Authors:  Zhenming Yu; Lindsey D Goodman; Shin-Yi Shieh; Michelle Min; Xiuyin Teng; Yongqing Zhu; Nancy M Bonini
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2014-10-09       Impact factor: 6.150

8.  RNA binding specificity of Drosophila muscleblind.

Authors:  Emily S Goers; Rodger B Voelker; Devika P Gates; J Andrew Berglund
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2008-06-17       Impact factor: 3.162

9.  Sequence determinants of human microsatellite variability.

Authors:  Trevor J Pemberton; Conner I Sandefur; Mattias Jakobsson; Noah A Rosenberg
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 3.969

10.  Secondary structure formation and DNA instability at fragile site FRA16B.

Authors:  Allison A Burrow; Allison Marullo; Lindsay R Holder; Yuh-Hwa Wang
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.