Literature DB >> 15292006

Renal blood flow alteration after paracentesis in women with ovarian hyperstimulation.

Sharon Maslovitz1, Ariel Jaffa, Osnat Eytan, Igal Wolman, Ariel Many, Joseph B Lessing, Ronni Gamzu.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate renal arterial resistance to flow by Doppler indices concurrently with ascites drainage in women with severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome.
METHODS: We conducted an interventional clinical study of 19 women with severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, manifested by free peritoneal fluid. The subjects were evaluated before and after therapeutic paracentesis by measuring urine output, blood urea nitrogen, intra-abdominal pressure, and renal artery flow measures by Doppler ultrasonography (systolic/diastolic ratio [S/D] and resistance index).
RESULTS: An average of 3,340 mL of ascitic fluid was drained, and the intra-abdominal pressure decreased from 17.5 +/- 1.24 cm H2O to 10 +/- 1.22 cm H2O. Urine output was increased (by 65%, from 925 +/- 248 mL/d before paracentesis to 1,523 +/- 526 mL/d on the day after paracentesis, P <.001). The mean renal arterial S/D decreased from 3 +/- 0.15 to 2.29 +/- 0.13 (P =.001). Most of the decrease in intra-abdominal pressure as well as in renal vasculature resistance was apparent after an initial drainage of 2,000 mL. Additional fluid drainage had only negligible effect on intra-abdominal pressure and renal flow.
CONCLUSION: Paracentesis lowered intra-abdominal pressure and decreased renal arterial resistance (lowered S/D and resistance index), ultimately resulting in increased urine production. It is plausible that the beneficial effects of paracentesis on urine output in ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome are due to improved renal blood flow from a direct decompression effect.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15292006     DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000129956.97012.0d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  5 in total

1.  Are anthropometric data a tool for determining the severity of OHSS? Yes, it could be!

Authors:  Aleksei Petrovich Petrenko; Camil Castelo-Branco; Dimitry Vasilevich Marshalov; Alexander Valerievich Kuligin; Efim Munevich Shifman; Elena Sergeevna Nesnova; Batsunova Mariia Olegovna
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 2.742

Review 2.  The pathophysiology of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: an unrecognized compartment syndrome.

Authors:  Lisa C Grossman; Konstantinos G Michalakis; Hyacinth Browne; Mark D Payson; James H Segars
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 7.329

3.  Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in a spontaneous pregnancy with invasive mole: report of a case.

Authors:  Myriam Rachad; Hikmat Chaara; Fatim Zahra Fdili; Hakima Bouguern; Abdilah Melhouf
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2011-06-27

4.  Large-Volume Paracentesis, up to 27 L, With Adjuvant Vaginal Cabergoline in the Case of Severe Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome with Successful Pregnancy Outcome: A Case Report.

Authors:  Nupur Agarwal; Sanghamitra Ghosh; Shikha Bathwal; Baidyanath Chakravarty
Journal:  J Hum Reprod Sci       Date:  2017 Jul-Sep

5.  Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome as an etiology of obstructive uropathy.

Authors:  Creticus P Marak; Amit Chopra; Narendrakumar Alappan; Ana M Ponea; Achuta K Guddati
Journal:  Case Rep Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-06-26
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.