Literature DB >> 15291865

Modified ureterosigmoidostomy (Mainz Pouch II) in different age groups and with different techniques of ureteric implantation.

Patrick J Bastian1, Peter Albers, Axel Haferkamp, Stefan Schumacher, Stefan C Müller.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the outcome of Mainz Pouch II urinary diversion in different age groups and with different techniques of ureteric implantation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between March 1995 and August 2002 a Mainz Pouch II was created in 41 patients (27 male and 14 female, median age 56.3 years, range 2-75) with 81 renal units (RU). For analysis, the patients were divided into 29 (70%) aged <65 years and 12 (30%) aged >65 years. Ureteric implantation with the Goodwin-Hohenfellner (GH) technique was used in 55 RU, with the Abol-Enein (AE) modification in 23 and Le-Duc procedure in three. The median (range) follow-up (available for 36 patients, 88%) was 19 (1-80) months. An unvalidated questionnaire was used to determine specific urinary diversion items.
RESULTS: Early complications occurred in 7% of patients, none requiring surgical intervention. Pyelonephritis occurred in five of 36 patients and seven of 71 RU (14% of the patients, 10% of the RU); all patients were <65 years old. In five of seven RU pyelonephritis was caused by the development of upper urinary tract dilatation; none required surgical revision. Ureteric stenosis requiring reimplantation occurred in two RU (2%, one GH, one AE). All patients were continent in the daytime; all but one patient had to wake to urinate at night, with 36% having to do so more than six times. Of the patients, 63% were able to distinguish between stool and urine. Initially, alkalinizing drugs to prevent metabolic acidosis were taken by 30% of the patients. Of previously medicated patients with a follow-up of >1 year, 8% required oral alkalinizing medication.
CONCLUSION: The Mainz Pouch II is a safe and reproducible urinary diversion, and serves as a satisfying alternative to other forms of continent urinary diversion in all age groups. The follow-up shows a low complication rate with good results in terms of continence. There were no significant differences in complication rates for the different ureteric implantation techniques. The long-term results remain to be evaluated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15291865     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2004.04963.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  6 in total

1.  [The history of ureterosigmoidostomy].

Authors:  S C Müller; P J Bastian
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  Perioperative metabolic alkalemia is more frequent than metabolic acidemia in major elective abdominal surgery.

Authors:  Mona Boaz; Arkady Iskhakov; Alexander Tsivian; Mordechai Shimonov; Haim Berkenstadt; Alexander Izakson; Peter Szmuk; Shmuel Evron; Michael Muggia; Tiberiu Ezri
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 3.  Carcinoma arising in enteric diversion or rectal neobladder for bladder exstrophy.

Authors:  R Ragu; G Meurette; M Kim; L Le Normand; P A Lehur
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2016-09-03       Impact factor: 3.781

4.  Ethical aspects of urinary diversion for women with irreparable obstetric fistulas in developing countries.

Authors:  L Lewis Wall; Steven D Arrowsmith; Brian D Hancock
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2008-01-24

5.  Detubularised isolated ureterosigmoidostomy (Atta pouch): Manometric and radiological studies in a sample of patients.

Authors:  Mohamed A Atta; Tamer A Youssif; Tamer A Youssef; Gerges F Boules; Ahmed F Kotb
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2014-03-24

6.  Comparison of open and intracorporeal modified ureterosigmoidostomy (Mainz II) after laparoscopic radical cystectomy with bladder cancer.

Authors:  Duo Zheng; Junyao Liu; Gongjin Wu; Shujun Yang; Chuang Luo; Tianci Du; Yao Luo; Junsheng Bao; Junqiang Tian; Zhiping Wang; Panfeng Shang; Zhongjin Yue
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-02-20       Impact factor: 2.754

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.