RATIONALE: Antidepressants are known to modify human sleep patterns. OBJECTIVES:Duloxetine is a new antidepressant with a mechanism of action involving reuptake inhibition of both serotonin (5-HT) and norepinephrine (NE). In this study, the effects of two dosing regimens of duloxetine on sleep electroencephalography (EEG) were investigated at steady-state plasma concentrations in young, healthy, male subjects. METHODS:Placebo (n=12), desipramine (50 mg BID; n=12) and two regimens of duloxetine (80 mg QD, n=6; or 60 mg BID, n=6) were compared in a randomized, double-blind, three-period crossover study, each treatment being administered from day 1 to day 7. Sleep polygraphic recordings took place at baseline (day -1) and day 6 of each period. The Leeds sleep evaluation questionnaire (LSEQ) was also administered on the morning of day 7. RESULTS: Both regimens of duloxetine produced a significant increase in the onset latency of REM sleep as well as a significant mean decrease in total REM sleep duration. Desipramine exhibited comparable effects. When compared to placebo, sleep continuity was significantly reduced with desipramine and duloxetine 60 mg BID whereas a significant improvement was observed with duloxetine 80 mg QD. On the LSEQ, duloxetine 80 mg QD produced a significant improvement in the "getting to sleep" subscale compared to placebo, whereas desipramine demonstrated a significant reduction (worsening) in the "quality of sleep" score versus placebo. CONCLUSIONS: The two dose regimens of duloxetine (80 mg QD and 60 mg BID) produced a REM sleep pattern comparable to that of most antidepressant medications. Duloxetine 80 mg QD appeared to exhibit less impact upon sleep quality than duloxetine 60 mg BID in healthy subjects.
RCT Entities:
RATIONALE: Antidepressants are known to modify human sleep patterns. OBJECTIVES:Duloxetine is a new antidepressant with a mechanism of action involving reuptake inhibition of both serotonin (5-HT) and norepinephrine (NE). In this study, the effects of two dosing regimens of duloxetine on sleep electroencephalography (EEG) were investigated at steady-state plasma concentrations in young, healthy, male subjects. METHODS: Placebo (n=12), desipramine (50 mg BID; n=12) and two regimens of duloxetine (80 mg QD, n=6; or 60 mg BID, n=6) were compared in a randomized, double-blind, three-period crossover study, each treatment being administered from day 1 to day 7. Sleep polygraphic recordings took place at baseline (day -1) and day 6 of each period. The Leeds sleep evaluation questionnaire (LSEQ) was also administered on the morning of day 7. RESULTS: Both regimens of duloxetine produced a significant increase in the onset latency of REM sleep as well as a significant mean decrease in total REM sleep duration. Desipramine exhibited comparable effects. When compared to placebo, sleep continuity was significantly reduced with desipramine and duloxetine 60 mg BID whereas a significant improvement was observed with duloxetine 80 mg QD. On the LSEQ, duloxetine 80 mg QD produced a significant improvement in the "getting to sleep" subscale compared to placebo, whereas desipramine demonstrated a significant reduction (worsening) in the "quality of sleep" score versus placebo. CONCLUSIONS: The two dose regimens of duloxetine (80 mg QD and 60 mg BID) produced a REM sleep pattern comparable to that of most antidepressant medications. Duloxetine 80 mg QD appeared to exhibit less impact upon sleep quality than duloxetine 60 mg BID in healthy subjects.
Authors: N Brunello; R Armitage; I Feinberg; E Holsboer-Trachsler; D Léger; P Linkowski; W B Mendelson; G Racagni; B Saletu; A L Sharpley; F Turek; E Van Cauter; J Mendlewicz Journal: Neuropsychobiology Date: 2000 Impact factor: 2.328
Authors: Charles B Nemeroff; Alan F Schatzberg; David J Goldstein; Michael J Detke; Craig Mallinckrodt; Yili Lu; Pierre V Tran Journal: Psychopharmacol Bull Date: 2002
Authors: Piedad Morillas-Arques; Carmen Ma Rodriguez-Lopez; Rocio Molina-Barea; Fernando Rico-Villademoros; Elena P Calandre Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2010-09-10 Impact factor: 2.362
Authors: Julia Boyle; Malin E V Eriksson; Laura Gribble; Ravi Gouni; Sigurd Johnsen; David V Coppini; David Kerr Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2012-09-18 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Lois E Krahn; Donna L Arand; Alon Y Avidan; David G Davila; William A DeBassio; Chad M Ruoff; Christopher G Harrod Journal: J Clin Sleep Med Date: 2021-12-01 Impact factor: 4.324
Authors: Peter Hutka; Michaela Krivosova; Zuzana Muchova; Ingrid Tonhajzerova; Andrea Hamrakova; Zuzana Mlyncekova; Juraj Mokry; Igor Ondrejka Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2021-01-29 Impact factor: 5.923