Literature DB >> 15289129

Endothelial cell density after posterior lamellar keratoplasty (Melles techniques): 3 years follow-up.

Bart Van Dooren1, Paul G H Mulder, Carla P Nieuwendaal, W H Beekhuis, Gerrit R J Melles.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To report the midterm endothelial cell density measurements after posterior lamellar keratoplasty (Melles techniques).
DESIGN: Cohort study.
METHODS: Fifteen consecutive eyes of 15 patients in whom a posterior lamellar keratoplasty procedure was performed for pseudophakic bullous keratopathy or Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy were evaluated. In 11 corneas the donor tissue was inserted through a 9.0-mm sclerocorneal pocket incision (technique A); in four cases the donor was folded and inserted through a 5.0-mm incision (technique B). Specular microscopy was performed at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months after surgery, to measure the endothelial cell density.
RESULTS: Mean postoperative endothelial cell density averaged 2,126 cells/mm(2) (+/-548) at 6 months, 1,859 cells/mm(2) (+/-477) at 12 months, 1,385 cells/mm(2) (+/-451) at 24 months, and 1,047 cells/mm(2) (+/-425) at 36 months.
CONCLUSION: In posterior lamellar keratoplasty, the donor corneal endothelium showed a decrease in cell density similar to that after conventional full-thickness penetrating keratoplasty.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15289129     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2004.02.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0002-9394            Impact factor:   5.258


  12 in total

1.  Effect of incision width on graft survival and endothelial cell loss after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty.

Authors:  Marianne O Price; Maria Bidros; Mark Gorovoy; Francis W Price; Beth A Benetz; Harry J Menegay; Sara M Debanne; Jonathan H Lass
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.651

2.  A new donor cornea harvesting technique for posterior lamellar keratoplasty.

Authors:  O Suwan-apichon; M Rizen; J M G Reyes; S Herretes; A Behrens; W J Stark; R S Chuck
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 4.638

Review 3.  [Lamellar keratoplasty. Back to the future?!].

Authors:  G Geerling; G I W Duncker; J Krumeich; G R J Melles
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 4.  Surgical alternatives to penetrating keratoplasty II: endothelial keratoplasty.

Authors:  Kenneth M Goins
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.031

Review 5.  Graft failure: I. Endothelial cell loss.

Authors:  Ilse Claerhout; Hilde Beele; Philippe Kestelyn
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.031

6.  Endothelial keratoplasty: clinical outcomes in the two years following deep lamellar endothelial keratoplasty (an American Ophthalmological Society thesis).

Authors:  Mark A Terry
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2007

7.  Preservation of Human Cornea.

Authors:  W John Armitage
Journal:  Transfus Med Hemother       Date:  2011-03-16       Impact factor: 3.747

8.  Endothelial Keratoplasty: From DLEK to DMEK.

Authors:  Mark M Fernandez; Natalie A Afshari
Journal:  Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-01

9.  A comparison of posterior lamellar keratoplasty modalities: DLEK vs. DSEK.

Authors:  Chan-Hui Yi; Dong-Hoon Lee; Eui-Sang Chung; Tae-Young Chung
Journal:  Korean J Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-08-03

Review 10.  [Keratoplasty: laminate or penetrate? Part 2: lamellar keratoplasty].

Authors:  P Maier; T Reinhard
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 1.059

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.