Literature DB >> 15288244

Target-biased scoring approaches and expert systems in structure-based virtual screening.

Johanna M Jansen1, Eric J Martin.   

Abstract

Structure-based virtual screening followed by selection of a top fraction of the rank-ordered result list suffers from many false positives and false negatives because the general scoring functions are not accurate enough. Many approaches have emerged to address this problem by including knowledge about the specific target in the scoring and selection steps. This target bias can include requirements for critical interactions, use of pharmacophore patterns or interaction patterns found in known co-crystal structures, and similarity to known ligands. Such biases are implemented in methods that vary from filtering tools for pre- or post-processing, to expert systems, quantitative (re)scoring functions, and docking tools that generate target-biased poses.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15288244     DOI: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2004.06.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Chem Biol        ISSN: 1367-5931            Impact factor:   8.822


  8 in total

Review 1.  Towards the development of universal, fast and highly accurate docking/scoring methods: a long way to go.

Authors:  N Moitessier; P Englebienne; D Lee; J Lawandi; C R Corbeil
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2007-11-26       Impact factor: 8.739

2.  Optimization of CAMD techniques 3. Virtual screening enrichment studies: a help or hindrance in tool selection?

Authors:  Andrew C Good; Tudor I Oprea
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2008-01-09       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  Computational Methods for Structure-Based Drug Design Through System Biology.

Authors:  Aman Chandra Kaushik; Shakti Sahi; Dong-Qing Wei
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

4.  The Development of Target-Specific Pose Filter Ensembles To Boost Ligand Enrichment for Structure-Based Virtual Screening.

Authors:  Jie Xia; Jui-Hua Hsieh; Huabin Hu; Song Wu; Xiang Simon Wang
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 4.956

5.  Cheminformatics meets molecular mechanics: a combined application of knowledge-based pose scoring and physical force field-based hit scoring functions improves the accuracy of structure-based virtual screening.

Authors:  Jui-Hua Hsieh; Shuangye Yin; Xiang S Wang; Shubin Liu; Nikolay V Dokholyan; Alexander Tropsha
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 4.956

6.  Combining docking with pharmacophore filtering for improved virtual screening.

Authors:  Megan L Peach; Marc C Nicklaus
Journal:  J Cheminform       Date:  2009-05-20       Impact factor: 5.514

Review 7.  Virtual ligand screening: strategies, perspectives and limitations.

Authors:  Gerhard Klebe
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 7.851

Review 8.  Mimicking Strategy for Protein-Protein Interaction Inhibitor Discovery by Virtual Screening.

Authors:  Ke-Jia Wu; Pui-Man Lei; Hao Liu; Chun Wu; Chung-Hang Leung; Dik-Lung Ma
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 4.411

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.