Literature DB >> 15287637

Surgical infections after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: ceftriaxone vs ceftazidime antibiotic prophylaxis. A prospective study.

Sergio Colizza1, Stefano Rossi, Biagio Picardi, Pasquale Carnuccio, Stefano Pollicita, Francesco Rodio, Giuseppe Cucchiara.   

Abstract

The incidence of surgical infections after laparoscopic cholecystectomy is reported to be <2%, because of the minimal trauma due to this approach. We report the results of a prospective study of antibiotic prophylaxis in laparoscopic cholecystectomy, comparing ceftriaxone vs ceftazidime. From Jan 1 to Dec 31 2002 a consecutive series of 242 cholecystectomies were performed, consisting in 18 open cholecystectomies and 224 laparoscopic cholecystectomies, 7 of which (3.1%) were converted to open cholecystectomies for technical and/or anatomical reasons. One hundred and eleven patients received 1 g i.v. ceftazidime 1 h before surgery, and 105 patients 1 g i.v. ceftriaxone on an alternate basis. Thirty-nine patients (17.4%) with acute cholecystitis received at least one booster dose at the end of the operation; 30 out of 39 were given further therapy for 2-3 days, i.e. 1 g i.v. bid. Twenty-two patients treated elsewhere with ceftriaxone or ceftazidime before surgery were transferred to another prophylactic regimen. The final diagnosis in the laparoscopic cholecystectomy group was 219 bile stones, 3 adenomas, and 2 occult carcinomas. We had 4 complications (1.8% of 217 laparoscopic cholecystectomies), 2 of which were minor (infection of the umbilical access by S. aureus) and 2 major (1 biliary fistula [accessory duct] and 1 acute pancreatitis), both treated conservatively. Positive bile cultures (27 cases) were unrelated to the clinical course. The incidence of infections after laparoscopic cholecystectomy in our prospective series was <2%. Ceftriaxone is confirmed as the gold standard in biliary tract surgery, but ceftazidime was equivalent (no statistical difference between the two antibiotics, P=0.59 NS). Ultra-short prophylaxis is enough in most cases, except in cholecystitis. We found no correlation between positive bile cultures and surgical infections after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The umbilicus was the preferred site of infection in obese patients after the laparoscopic procedure. Major complications are usually related to technical pitfalls.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15287637

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chir Ital        ISSN: 0009-4773


  10 in total

1.  Intravenous Versus Oral Antibiotic Prophylaxis Efficacy for Elective Laparoscopic Cholecystectomies: a Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  A Serdar Karaca; Haldun Gündoğdu; Mehmet Özdoğan; Eren Ersoy
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2013-08-03       Impact factor: 0.656

2.  Role of Prophylactic Antibiotics in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.

Authors:  A Gaur; A K Pujahari
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2011-07-21

3.  Safety and Efficacy of Trocar Port-Site Closure Using a Biological Plug Closure in Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery: a Prospective Study.

Authors:  Youssef Andraos
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2022-09-07       Impact factor: 3.479

4.  Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: is it more than a challenge?

Authors:  Sinan Ersin; Ozgur Firat; Murat Sozbilen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-06-17       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  The efficacy of cefazolin in reducing surgical site infection in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized double-blind controlled trial.

Authors:  Sakchai Ruangsin; Supparerk Laohawiriyakamol; Somkiat Sunpaweravong; Somrit Mahattanobon
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Analysis of laparoscopic port site complications: A descriptive study.

Authors:  Somu Karthik; Alfred Joseph Augustine; Mundunadackal Madhavan Shibumon; Manohar Varadaraya Pai
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.407

7.  Role of prophylactic antibiotics in elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sang Hoon Kim; Hee Chul Yu; Jae Do Yang; Sung Woo Ahn; Hong Pil Hwang
Journal:  Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg       Date:  2018-08-31

8.  Umbilical port-site complications in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: role of topical antibiotic therapy.

Authors:  Vincenzo Neri; Alberto Fersini; Antonio Ambrosi; Nicola Tartaglia; Tiziano Pio Valentino
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2008 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.172

9.  Wound complications following laparoscopic surgery in a nigerian hospital.

Authors:  Adewale O Adisa; Olusegun I Alatise; Elugwaraonu A Agbakwuru; David O Akinola; Olusanya Adejuyigbe
Journal:  Niger J Surg       Date:  2014-07

10.  The Effect of Prophylactic Antibiotics on Post Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Infectious Complications: A Double-Blinded Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Ali Asghar Darzi; Alieh Nikmanesh; Farhad Bagherian
Journal:  Electron Physician       Date:  2016-05-25
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.