Literature DB >> 15287306

Are there any complications with bioabsorbable fixation devices? A 10 year review in orthognathic surgery.

P Laine1, R Kontio, C Lindqvist, R Suuronen.   

Abstract

Bioabsorbable fixation devices have been used in our departments between November 1991 and November 2001 in orthognathic surgery. The aim of this retrospective study was to assess all complications experienced during this time period, when we have operated 163 patients who have undergone 329 orthognathic osteotomies fixated with bioresorbable devices. No postoperative intermaxillary fixation was used. Light guiding elastics were used for 5 to 7 weeks. Patients' acceptance was generally excellent and very few complications occurred during this follow-up of 10 years. The complications were minor and did not affect the end results of the operations. Minor complications occurred in 14 patients (8.6%). Only one patient (0.6%) had a postoperative infection with elevated infection parameters. The other minor complications consisted mainly of dehiscence of the wound and plate exposure together with granulation tissue in the operation field. The rest of the complications occurred in the beginning of our study, when large screw heads on top of the bone irritated the patient and had to be removed. Insufficient fixation resulted in open bite in three patients (1.8%) in the beginning of the trial use of new devices, which no longer are used. Based on our experience, bioresorbable devices are safe to be used in orthognathic procedures. However, there is a learning curve, as there is with all new methods introduced.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15287306     DOI: 10.1006/ijom.2003.0510

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0901-5027            Impact factor:   2.789


  6 in total

1.  Rib fracture repair: indications, technical issues, and future directions.

Authors:  Raminder Nirula; Jose J Diaz; Donald D Trunkey; John C Mayberry
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Cost-Effectiveness of a Biodegradable Compared to a Titanium Fixation System in Maxillofacial Surgery: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  N B van Bakelen; K M Vermeulen; G J Buijs; J Jansma; J G A M de Visscher; Th J M Hoppenreijs; J E Bergsma; B Stegenga; R R M Bos
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-20       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  Bioabsorbable osteofixation for orthognathic surgery.

Authors:  Young-Wook Park
Journal:  Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2015-02-19

4.  Comparison of the long-term clinical performance of a biodegradable and a titanium fixation system in maxillofacial surgery: A multicenter randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  B Gareb; N B van Bakelen; G J Buijs; J Jansma; J G A M de Visscher; Th J M Hoppenreijs; J E Bergsma; B van Minnen; B Stegenga; R R M Bos
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Zygomatic complex fracture: A comparative evaluation of stability using titanium and bio-resorbable plates as one point fixation.

Authors:  Nalini Tripathi; Manoj Goyal; Brijesh Mishra; Satish Dhasmana
Journal:  Natl J Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2013-07

6.  Are Biodegradable Osteosyntheses Still an Option for Midface Trauma? Longitudinal Evaluation of Three Different PLA-Based Materials.

Authors:  Andreas Kolk; Robert Köhnke; Christoph H Saely; Oliver Ploder
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-09-27       Impact factor: 3.411

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.