| Literature DB >> 15286912 |
Abstract
We studied whether oxygen uptake from the surrounding water might enhance survival in submerged third instar larvae of Phaeoxantha klugii, a tiger beetle from the central Amazonian floodplains. Local oxygen partial pressures (Po(2)) were measured with microcoaxial needle electrodes close to larvae submerged in initially air-saturated still water. The Po(2) profiles showed that the larvae exploit oxygen from the aquatic medium. Metabolism in the air of more or less resting larvae was determined by measuring the rate of CO(2) production (sV dot co2) with an infrared gas analyzer at 29 degrees C. The sV dot co2 was around 1.8 mu L g(-1) min(-1), equivalent to an oxygen consumption rate (sV dot o2) of 1.8-2.6 mu L g(-1) min(-1). Oxygen consumption (V dot o2) of individually submerged larvae measured in closed respiration chambers at 19-10.3 kPa Po(2) (initially air saturated, 29 degrees C) ranged between 0.05 and 0.2 mu L min(-1) and was not correlated with body mass. The sV dot o2 ranged between 0.1 and 0.4 mu L min(-1), that is, 4%-22% of the metabolic rate measured in air. Mean V dot o2 decreased with declining Po(2); however, some individuals showed contrary patterns. V dot o2 was additionally measured in dormant larvae, in larvae submerged for 1-2 d in open water or for 30-49 d within sediment, as well as in larvae exposed to anoxia before the measurements. The range of V dot o2 was similar in all groups, indicating that the larvae exploit oxygen from the water whenever available. Similar V dot o2 across the whole range of body mass investigated (0.31-0.76 g) suggests that oxygen uptake occurs by spiracular uptake. Assuming that larvae survive for some time at rates comparable to depressed metabolic rates reported for other insect species, it can be concluded that oxygen uptake from water can sustain aerobic metabolism even under quite severe hypoxia. It might therefore play an important role for survival during inundation periods.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2004 PMID: 15286912 DOI: 10.1086/383504
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Physiol Biochem Zool ISSN: 1522-2152 Impact factor: 2.247