Literature DB >> 15286694

High-dose treosulfan in patients with relapsed or refractory high-grade lymphoma receiving tandem autologous blood stem cell transplantation.

M Koenigsmann1, M Mohren, K Jentsch-Ullrich, A Franke, E Becker, M Heim, M Freund, J Casper.   

Abstract

This phase I/II study evaluated high-dose treosulfan in patients with high-grade lymphoma. In all, 21 patients (median age 51, 25-60 years) with primary refractory disease (n=3) or early (n=11) or late (n=7) relapse received DexaBEAM and one course etoposide for cytoreduction and PBPC mobilization. Subsequently, 16 patients received 30 g/m2 treosulfan and 140 mg/m2 melphalan, followed by autologous transplantation. Nine patients received a 2nd high-dose treatment (HDT) with 30 g/m2 treosulfan and 750 mg/m2 thiotepa. Recovery time to >1/nl leukocytes and >25/nl thrombocytes was 8.9 (range 8-11) and 11.9 (8-16) days after 1st and 9.6 (7-13) and 13 (9-19) days after 2nd HDT. Reversible grade 3 or 4 nonhematologic toxicities included mucositis (n=7), infection (n=7) and one episode of re-entry tachycardia. Two treatment-related deaths occurred after 2nd HDT. Since three dose-limiting toxicities occurred among nine patients receiving tandem HDT, 30 g/m2 of treosulfan was considered MTD in this setting. Patients with late compared to early relapse or refractory disease had a higher probability of CR (6/7 vs 3/14 patients, P=0.017) and overall survival (71 vs 21%, P<0.05, 24-49 months follow-up). In conclusion, high-dose treosulfan as major therapy component induces sustained complete remissions in relapsed high-grade lymphoma with acceptable toxicity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15286694     DOI: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1704626

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant        ISSN: 0268-3369            Impact factor:   5.483


  4 in total

1.  Comparison of Melphalan Combined with Treosulfan or Busulfan as High-Dose Chemotherapy before Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in AML.

Authors:  Ekaterina Gurevich; Michael Hayoz; Yolanda Aebi; Carlo R Largiadèr; Behrouz Mansouri Taleghani; Ulrike Bacher; Thomas Pabst
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 6.639

2.  Risk-adapted, treosulfan-based therapy with auto- and allo-SCT for relapsed/refractory aggressive NHL: a prospective phase-II trial.

Authors:  M Koenigsmann; J Casper; C Kahl; N Basara; H G Sayer; G Behre; S Theurich; M Christopeit; M Mohren; A Reichle; B Metzner; A Ganser; M Stadler; L Uharek; L Balleisen; A Hinke; R Hinke; D Niederwieser
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2013-12-23       Impact factor: 5.483

3.  Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Treosulfan in Patients With Thalassemia Major Undergoing Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.

Authors:  Ezhilpavai Mohanan; John C Panetta; Kavitha M Lakshmi; Eunice S Edison; Anu Korula; Fouzia Na; Aby Abraham; Auro Viswabandya; Biju George; Vikram Mathews; Alok Srivastava; Poonkuzhali Balasubramanian
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2018-01-17       Impact factor: 6.875

4.  Treosulfan plus fludarabine versus TEAM as conditioning treatment before autologous stem cell transplantation for B-cell Non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

Authors:  Jochen J Frietsch; Jenny Miethke; Paul Linke; Carl C Crodel; Ulf Schnetzke; Sebastian Scholl; Andreas Hochhaus; Inken Hilgendorf
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 5.174

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.