Literature DB >> 15286137

Methods for pooling results from multi-center studies.

H Worthington1.   

Abstract

A multi-center study is one conducted simultaneously in several participating centers following an agreed protocol, where the randomization has been carried out independently within each center. The main consideration for pooling the data from the individual centers is the choice between a weighted analysis, which weights centers relative to the number of patients in them, or an unweighted analysis as the primary statistical method. The unweighted analysis is used to investigate whether there was an interaction between the centers and study groups. Another issue is whether a fixed- or random-effects model should be used. There is unresolved controversy among statisticians about whether to use a weighted (type II) or unweighted analysis (type III), since there are advantages and disadvantages to the use of either method. The weighted analysis provides the most powerful test of the treatment contrast if there is no interaction between treatment and center. If there is an interaction, the unweighted analysis leads to unbiased estimates. Although, from an estimation and hypothesis testing standpoint, there is no need to balance the number of patients between the sites, it is sensible to avoid major imbalances among the study sites. There is agreement among statisticians that a fixed-effects model should be used.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15286137     DOI: 10.1177/154405910408301s25

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dent Res        ISSN: 0022-0345            Impact factor:   6.116


  5 in total

1.  Analysis of combined data from heterogeneous study designs: an applied example from the patient navigation research program.

Authors:  Richard G Roetzheim; Karen M Freund; Don K Corle; David M Murray; Frederick R Snyder; Andrea C Kronman; Pascal Jean-Pierre; Peter C Raich; Alan Ec Holden; Julie S Darnell; Victoria Warren-Mears; Steven Patierno
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 2.486

2.  Coordination and management of multisite complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) therapies: experience from a multisite reflexology intervention trial.

Authors:  Mohammad H Rahbar; Gwen Wyatt; Alla Sikorskii; David Victorson; Manouchehr Ardjomand-Hessabi
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2011-06-02       Impact factor: 2.226

3.  The Neuro/PsyGRID calibration experiment: identifying sources of variance and bias in multicenter MRI studies.

Authors:  John Suckling; Anna Barnes; Dominic Job; David Brennan; Katherine Lymer; Paola Dazzan; Tiago Reis Marques; Clare MacKay; Shane McKie; Steve R Williams; Steven C R Williams; Bill Deakin; Stephen Lawrie
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Comparing methods to estimate treatment effects on a continuous outcome in multicentre randomized controlled trials: a simulation study.

Authors:  Rong Chu; Lehana Thabane; Jinhui Ma; Anne Holbrook; Eleanor Pullenayegum; Philip James Devereaux
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2011-02-21       Impact factor: 4.615

5.  Harmonization, data management, and statistical issues related to prospective multicenter studies in Ankylosing spondylitis (AS): Experience from the Prospective Study Of Ankylosing Spondylitis (PSOAS) cohort.

Authors:  Mohammad H Rahbar; MinJae Lee; Manouchehr Hessabi; Amirali Tahanan; Matthew A Brown; Thomas J Learch; Laura A Diekman; Michael H Weisman; John D Reveille
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials Commun       Date:  2018-07-25
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.