Literature DB >> 15286093

Central effects of fexofenadine and cetirizine: measurement of psychomotor performance, subjective sleepiness, and brain histamine H1-receptor occupancy using 11C-doxepin positron emission tomography.

Manabu Tashiro1, Yumiko Sakurada, Kentaro Iwabuchi, Hideki Mochizuki, Motohisa Kato, Mariko Aoki, Yoshihito Funaki, Masatoshi Itoh, Ren Iwata, Dean F Wong, Kazuhiko Yanai.   

Abstract

Histamine H1-receptor (H1R) antagonists, or antihistamines, often induce sedative side effects when used for the treatment of allergic disorders. This study compared the sedative profiles of the second-generation antihistamines, fexofenadine and cetirizine, using 3 different criteria: subjective sleepiness evaluated by the Stanford Sleepiness Scale, objective psychomotor tests (simple and choice reaction time tests and visual discrimination tests at 4 different exposure durations), and measurement of histamine H1-receptor occupancy (H1RO) in the brain. Subjective sleepiness and psychomotor performance were measured in 20 healthy Japanese volunteers at baseline and 90 min after administration of fexofenadine 120 mg or cetirizine 20 mg in a double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study. Hydroxyzine 30 mg was included as a positive control. H1RO was measured using positron emission tomography (PET) with (11)C-doxepin in 12 of the 20 subjects, and a further 11 volunteers were recruited to act as controls. In psychomotor tests, fexofenadine was not significantly different from placebo and significantly less impairing than cetirizine on some tasks, as well as significantly less impairing than hydroxyzine on all tasks. For subjective sleepiness, fexofenadine was not significantly different from placebo, whereas cetirizine showed a trend toward increased sleepiness compared with fexofenadine and placebo. H1RO was negligible with fexofenadine (-0.1%) but moderately high with cetirizine (26.0%). In conclusion, fexofenadine 120 mg is distinguishable from cetirizine 20 mg, as assessed by H1RO and psychomotor testing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15286093     DOI: 10.1177/0091270004267590

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0091-2700            Impact factor:   3.126


  24 in total

1.  Brain histamine H receptor occupancy of orally administered antihistamines measured by positron emission tomography with (11)C-doxepin in a placebo-controlled crossover study design in healthy subjects: a comparison of olopatadine and ketotifen.

Authors:  Manabu Tashiro; Hideki Mochizuki; Yumiko Sakurada; Kenji Ishii; Keiichi Oda; Yuichi Kimura; Toru Sasaki; Kiichi Ishiwata; Kazuhiko Yanai
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  Repeated-dose effects of mequitazine, cetirizine and dexchlorpheniramine on driving and psychomotor performance.

Authors:  Eef L Theunissen; Annemiek Vermeeren; Johannes G Ramaekers
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 4.335

3.  H1 receptor-mediated vasodilatation contributes to postexercise hypotension.

Authors:  Jennifer M Lockwood; Brad W Wilkins; John R Halliwill
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2004-12-23       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Effects of sedative and non-sedative H1 antagonists on cognitive tasks: behavioral and near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) examinations.

Authors:  Takeo Tsujii; Eriko Yamamoto; Takayuki Ohira; Nozomu Saito; Shigeru Watanabe
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2007-05-30       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  Histamine H1 receptor antagonist cetirizine impairs working memory processing speed, but not episodic memory.

Authors:  P van Ruitenbeek; A Vermeeren; W J Riedel
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 6.  Second-generation antihistamines: actions and efficacy in the management of allergic disorders.

Authors:  Larry K Golightly; Leon S Greos
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 7.  Selecting the optimal oral antihistamine for patients with allergic rhinitis.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Lehman; Michael S Blaiss
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 9.546

8.  Assessment of the first and second generation antihistamines brain penetration and role of P-glycoprotein.

Authors:  Tanja Obradovic; Glenn G Dobson; Tomotaka Shingaki; Thomas Kungu; Ismael J Hidalgo
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2006-12-19       Impact factor: 4.200

9.  Tramadol-induced seizurogenic effect: a possible role of opioid-dependent histamine H1 receptor activation-linked mechanism.

Authors:  Ashish K Rehni; Thakur Gurjeet Singh; Nirmal Singh; Sandeep Arora
Journal:  Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol       Date:  2009-12-10       Impact factor: 3.000

10.  Effects of sedative and nonsedative antihistamines on prefrontal activity during verbal fluency task in young children: a near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) study.

Authors:  Takeo Tsujii; Sayako Masuda; Eriko Yamamoto; Takayuki Ohira; Takekazu Akiyama; Takao Takahashi; Shigeru Watanabe
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2009-08-25       Impact factor: 4.530

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.