Literature DB >> 15285533

Role of surgery in ovarian cancer: an update.

I Vergote1.   

Abstract

Rupture of an ovarian malignant tumor should be avoided at the time of surgery for an early ovarian cancer. Laparoscopic removal of ovarian cysts should be restricted to patients with preoperative evidence that the cyst is benign. Degree of differentiation is the most important independent prognostic factor in stage I disease and should be used in decisions on therapy in clinical practice and the future FIGO-classification of Stage I. In early ovarian cancer staging adequacy and tumor grade were the only 2 statistical significant prognostic factors for survival in the multivariate analysis of the EORTC ACTION-trial. According to the present data there is no scientific basis to rely only on adjuvant chemotherapy or on optimal staging procedure in medium and high risk stage I ovarian cancer. Primary debulking surgery by a gynecologic oncologist remains the standard of care in advanced ovarian cancer. Optimal debulking surgery should be defined as no residual tumor load. Interval debulking is defined as an operation performed after a short course of induction chemotherapy, usually 2 or 3 cycles. Based on the randomized EORTC-GCG trial, interval debulking by an experienced surgeon improves survival in some patients who did not undergo optimal primary debulking surgery. Based on the GOG 152 data, interval debulking surgery does not seem to be indicated in patients who underwent primarily a maximal surgical effort by a gynecological oncologist. Open laparoscopy is probably the most valuable tool for evaluating the operability primarily or at the time of interval debulking surgery. In retrospective analyses neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery does not seem to worsen prognosis compared to primary debulking surgery followed by chemotherapy. However, we will have to wait for the results of the EORTC-GCG/NCI Canada randomized trial to know whether neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery is as good as primary debulking surgery in some or all stage IIIc and IV patients. The most suitable candidates for secondary debulking surgery are those who had an initial complete response to chemotherapy, a long treatment-free interval (e.g. more than 12 months), and resectable disease (without diffuse carcinomatosis).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15285533     DOI: 10.1080/00015458.2004.11679550

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Chir Belg        ISSN: 0001-5458            Impact factor:   1.090


  7 in total

1.  The approach to ovarian dermoids in adolescents and young women.

Authors:  Kathleen E O'Neill; Amber R Cooper
Journal:  J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.814

2.  Predicting value of HE4 and CA125 markers for optimal cytoreductive surgery in ovarian cancer patients.

Authors:  Elham Saffarieh; Setare Nassiri; Majid Mirmohammadkhani
Journal:  Eur J Transl Myol       Date:  2022-08-01

Review 3.  Treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis from ovarian cancer. Present, future directions and proposals.

Authors:  F C Muñoz-Casares; S Rufián; M J Rubio; E Lizárraga; C Díaz-Iglesias; E Aranda; R Ciria; J Muntané; P Barrios; J Torres-Melero; S González-Moreno; L González-Bayón; B Camps; P Bretcha; J Farré; G Ortega-Pérez; A Gómez-Portilla
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.405

4.  The role of hyperthermic intraoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in the treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis in recurrent ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Francisco C Muñoz-Casares; Sebastián Rufián; María J Rubio; Carlos J Díaz; Rafael Díaz; Angela Casado; Alvaro Arjona; María C Muñoz-Villanueva; Jordi Muntané
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 5.  Peritoneal carcinomatosis.

Authors:  Federico Coccolini; Federico Gheza; Marco Lotti; Salvatore Virzì; Domenico Iusco; Claudio Ghermandi; Rita Melotti; Gianluca Baiocchi; Stefano Maria Giulini; Luca Ansaloni; Fausto Catena
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 6.  Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for FIGO stage I ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Frederico S Falcetta; Theresa A Lawrie; Lídia Rf Medeiros; Maria Ines da Rosa; Maria I Edelweiss; Airton T Stein; Alice Zelmanowicz; Anaelena B Moraes; Roselaine R Zanini; Daniela D Rosa
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-10-13

7.  Prognostic significance of FA score based on plasma fibrinogen and serum albumin in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Yuan Li; Jia-Ni Yang; Shan-Shan Cheng; Yu Wang
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 3.989

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.