Literature DB >> 15284788

Development of a large-scale obstetric quality-improvement program that focused on the nulliparous patient at term.

Elliott K Main1, Lori Bloomfield, Gordon Hunt.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to identify an appropriate population and a balanced set of maternal and neonatal measures to drive a hospital network obstetric quality improvement program. STUDY
DESIGN: Sutter Health, a large Northern California health care system with>40,000 births annually, served as the site for this project. We chose to focus on the standardized nulliparous patients: term, singleton, and vertex. A multidisciplinary task force evaluated and selected perinatal outcome and process measures. Data from every hospital were collected prospectively electronically and analyzed centrally.
RESULTS: Outcome measures that were selected included term, singleton, and vertex rates of 3rd/4th-degree laceration, cesarean birth, 5-minute Apgar score of <7, and patient satisfaction. The process measures included episiotomy, induction (37-41 weeks), and admittance with cervical dilation of > or =3 cm. Data collection completeness improved each quarter; by the end of 2002, the data collection completeness rate had reached 99.7%. Every measure demonstrated a large variation among our hospitals, which indicates opportunities for improvement.
CONCLUSION: This balanced set of measures for term, singleton, and vertex patients has been straightforward to collect over a large and diverse hospital system and has engaged all participants successfully.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15284788     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.02.055

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  7 in total

1.  The impact of the active management of risk in pregnancy at term on birth outcomes: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  James M Nicholson; Samuel Parry; Aaron B Caughey; Sarah Rosen; Allison Keen; George A Macones
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Risk adjustment models for interhospital comparison of CS rates using Robson's ten group classification system and other socio-demographic and clinical variables.

Authors:  Paola Colais; Maria P Fantini; Danilo Fusco; Elisa Carretta; Elisa Stivanello; Jacopo Lenzi; Giulia Pieri; Carlo A Perucci
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 3.007

3.  Risk adjustment for inter-hospital comparison of caesarean delivery rates in low-risk deliveries.

Authors:  Elisa Stivanello; Paola Rucci; Elisa Carretta; Giulia Pieri; Chiara Seghieri; Sabina Nuti; Eugene Declercq; Martina Taglioni; Maria Pia Fantini
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Race and satisfaction in general OB/GYN clinics.

Authors:  James E Rohrer; Jon D Lund; Susan Goldfarb
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2005-05-12       Impact factor: 2.809

5.  Intrapartum cesarean delivery in nulliparas: risk factors compared by two analytical approaches.

Authors:  M A Kominiarek; P VanVeldhuisen; K Gregory; M Fridman; H Kim; J U Hibbard
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 2.521

6.  Differential misclassification of confounders in comparative evaluation of hospital care quality: caesarean sections in Italy.

Authors:  Mirko Di Martino; Danilo Fusco; Paola Colais; Luigi Pinnarelli; Marina Davoli; Carlo Alberto Perucci
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 3.295

7.  The birth satisfaction scale: Turkish adaptation, validation and reliability study.

Authors:  Fatma Cosar Cetin; Ayse Sezer; Yeliz Dogan Merih
Journal:  North Clin Istanb       Date:  2015-09-25
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.