Literature DB >> 15284758

International Classification of Diseases-9th revision coding for preeclampsia: how accurate is it?

Stacie E Geller1, Shirin Ahmed, Monique L Brown, Suzanne M Cox, Deborah Rosenberg, Sarah J Kilpatrick.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of the International Classification of Diseases-9th revision codes for preeclampsia and eclampsia. STUDY
DESIGN: The University of Illinois Medical Center at Chicago discharge database was used to identify 135 women from 1999 through 2001 whose disease was coded as having preeclampsia or eclampsia. With American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology criteria as the gold standard, the diagnosis that was determined through chart review was compared with the International Classification of Diseases-9th revision code that was present in the discharge database. Patients were classified as true cases if the International Classification of Diseases-9th revision code matched the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists diagnosis; the positive predictive value of the code was then calculated.
RESULTS: The overall positive predictive value for the complete sample was only 54%, but the positive predictive value for severe preeclampsia was 84.8%, which was high compared with mild preeclampsia (45.3%) and eclampsia (41.7%). Diagnostic (clinician) error was the most common reason for miscoding error.
CONCLUSION: The findings suggest that International Classification of Diseases-9th revision codes for preeclampsia/eclampsia vary greatly in their accuracy of diagnosis. Therefore, a review of medical records is required when data are being gathered on the incidence of preeclampsia and eclampsia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15284758     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.03.061

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  37 in total

1.  Gestational hypertension and preeclampsia in living kidney donors.

Authors:  Amit X Garg; Immaculate F Nevis; Eric McArthur; Jessica M Sontrop; John J Koval; Ngan N Lam; Ainslie M Hildebrand; Peter P Reese; Leroy Storsley; John S Gill; Dorry L Segev; Steven Habbous; Ann Bugeja; Greg A Knoll; Christine Dipchand; Mauricio Monroy-Cuadros; Krista L Lentine
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  An enhanced method for identifying obstetric deliveries: implications for estimating maternal morbidity.

Authors:  Elena V Kuklina; Maura K Whiteman; Susan D Hillis; Denise J Jamieson; Susan F Meikle; Samuel F Posner; Polly A Marchbanks
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2007-08-10

3.  Evaluation of factors influencing accuracy of principal procedure coding based on ICD-9-CM: an Iranian study.

Authors:  Mehrdad Farzandipour; Abbas Sheikhtaheri
Journal:  Perspect Health Inf Manag       Date:  2009-05-07

4.  The utility of ICD9-CM codes in identifying induction of labor.

Authors:  Lisa D Levine; Meghana Limaye; Sindhu K Srinivas
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  2014-09-28       Impact factor: 1.862

5.  Stillbirth in an Anglophone minority of Canada.

Authors:  Nathalie Auger; Mark Daniel; Laust Mortensen; Clarisse Toa-Lou; André Costopoulos
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2015-01-15       Impact factor: 3.380

6.  Electronic Algorithm Is Superior to Hospital Discharge Codes for Diagnoses of Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy in Historical Cohorts.

Authors:  Natasa M Milic; Elisabeth Codsi; Yvonne S Butler Tobah; Wendy M White; Andrea G Kattah; Tracey L Weissgerber; Mie Saiki; Santosh Parashuram; Lisa E Vaughan; Amy L Weaver; Marko Savic; Michelle M Mielke; Vesna D Garovic
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 7.616

7.  Elevated risk of preeclampsia in pregnant women with depression: depression or antidepressants?

Authors:  Kristin Palmsten; Soko Setoguchi; Andrea V Margulis; Amanda R Patrick; Sonia Hernández-Díaz
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 4.897

8.  Antidepressant use and gestational hypertension: does evidence support causality? Reply letter.

Authors:  Anick Bérard; Mary A De Vera
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 4.335

9.  Antidepressant use and gestational hypertension: does evidence support causality?

Authors:  Luke E Grzeskowiak; Lars H Pedersen; Janna L Morrison
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 4.335

10.  Impact of bariatric surgery on hypertensive disorders in pregnancy: retrospective analysis of insurance claims data.

Authors:  Wendy L Bennett; Marta M Gilson; Roxanne Jamshidi; Anne E Burke; Jodi B Segal; Kimberley E Steele; Martin A Makary; Jeanne M Clark
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-04-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.