Literature DB >> 15284506

Effect of facetectomy on lumbar spinal stability under sagittal plane loadings.

Kim Kheng Lee1, E C Teo, T X Qiu, K Yang.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A study using an anatomically accurate finite-element model of a L2-L3 motion segment to investigate the biomechanical effects of graded bilateral and unilateral facetectomies of L3 under flexion and extension loadings.
OBJECTIVE: To predict the amount of facetectomy on lumbar motion segment that would cause segmental instability, therefore enhancing the understanding concerning the role of the facet under sagittal loadings. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: This study provides a quantitative study on the role of facets in preserving segmental lumbar stability. Previous analytical models lack of three-dimensional structural characterization and insufficient element representation for facet joints.
METHODS: A validated finite-element L2-L3 model was subjected to sagittal loadings at 7.5 Nm. Effects of ligaments and facets were examined to establish their relative importance on segment response. The effect of iatrogenic changes (graded unilateral and bilateral facetectomy) was then investigated under these loadings to predict the alterations in terms of gross external (angular and coupled) responses, flexibilities, and facet load.
RESULTS: This study shows the importance of preserving ligaments to prevent rotational instabilities for motion segment under flexion. The effect of the facetectomy on the motion segment is insignificant under flexion. In extension, unilateral facetectomy and resection on contralateral facet markedly alters the rotational motion and flexibilities as well as coupled motions. Also, unilateral complete facetectomy with resection of less than 100% on contralateral facet generates high facet load.
CONCLUSIONS: Clinically, this study suggests that it may be appropriate to incorporate additional stabilization procedure in restoring the spinal strength and stability for surgical intervention of unilateral complete facetectomy and resection on contralateral facet. The exploitation of the finite-element method to simulate clinically related situations permits an improved understanding of lumbar spinal stability to assist in defining clinical expectation for various forms of surgical intervention of the operative procedures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15284506     DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000132650.24437.15

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  12 in total

Review 1.  [Status quo of facet joint replacement].

Authors:  K Büttner-Janz
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Anterior shear strength of the porcine lumbar spine after laminectomy and partial facetectomy.

Authors:  Guido B van Solinge; Albert J van der Veen; Jaap H van Dieën; Idsart Kingma; Barend J van Royen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-06-27       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Percutaneous three column osteotomy for kyphotic deformity correction in congenital kyphosis.

Authors:  Nils Hansen-Algenstaedt; Roland Gessler; Matthias Goepfert; Reginald Knight
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Minimal-invasive TLIF.

Authors:  Nils Hansen-Algenstaedt; Melanie Liem; SalahAddeen O Khalifah; Ansgar Ilg; Alf Giese
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Biomechanical analysis of fusion segment rigidity upon stress at both the fusion and adjacent segments: a comparison between unilateral and bilateral pedicle screw fixation.

Authors:  Ho-Joong Kim; Kyoung-Tak Kang; Bong-Soon Chang; Choon-Ki Lee; Jang-Woo Kim; Jin S Yeom
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 2.759

Review 6.  Spinal facet joint biomechanics and mechanotransduction in normal, injury and degenerative conditions.

Authors:  Nicolas V Jaumard; William C Welch; Beth A Winkelstein
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 2.097

7.  Finite element analysis for comparison of spinous process osteotomies technique with conventional laminectomy as lumbar decompression procedure.

Authors:  Ho-Joong Kim; Heoung-Jae Chun; Kyoung-Tak Kang; Hwan-Mo Lee; Bong-Soon Chang; Choon-Ki Lee; Jin-S Yeom
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.759

8.  Bilateral Decompression via Microscopic TubularCrossing Laminotomy (MTCL) for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Technique and Early Surgical Result.

Authors:  Myung-Hoon Shin; Jin-Sung Kim; Kyeong-Sik Ryu; Jung-Woo Hur
Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)       Date:  2015-06-29       Impact factor: 1.742

9.  Anatomic Facet Replacement System (AFRS) Restoration of Lumbar Segment Mechanics to Intact: A Finite Element Study and In Vitro Cadaver Investigation.

Authors:  Vijay K Goel; Ankit Mehta; Jayant Jangra; Ahmed Faizan; Ali Kiapour; Robert W Hoy; Andrew R Fauth
Journal:  SAS J       Date:  2007-02-01

10.  Effects of cord pretension and stiffness of the Dynesys system spacer on the biomechanics of spinal decompression- a finite element study.

Authors:  Shih-Liang Shih; Chien-Lin Liu; Li-Ying Huang; Chang-Hung Huang; Chen-Sheng Chen
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.