Literature DB >> 15284370

The fermentation of different dietary fibers is associated with fecal clostridia levels in men.

Daisuke Chinda1, Shigeyuki Nakaji, Shinsaku Fukuda, Juichi Sakamoto, Tadashi Shimoyama, Teruo Nakamura, Tomohiko Fujisawa, Atsushi Terada, Kazuo Sugawara.   

Abstract

Only a few reports have compared the fermentation of pectin and cellulose using the hydrogen-breath test, and no studies have examined the relation between the hydrogen breathing pattern and colonic microflora. Using breath-hydrogen measurements, we investigated whether different dietary fibers (DFs) were fermented differently and whether there were individual differences after ingestion of the same DF; we also examined the relation between individual fecal microflora and the fermentation of DF. Results of hydrogen tests in 14 men were compared after they had ingested 20 g of pectin, 20 g of cellulose, or 6 g of lactulose (a DF-like substance). We examined the relation between the breath hydrogen results and the subjects' fecal microflora. We defined significant fermentation (i.e., positive cases) as a continuous rise in hydrogen in the expiratory air of >19 ppm. The subjects were divided into 3 groups according to their hydrogen breath test pattern, i.e., positive for lactulose and pectin (Group LP, n = 4); positive for lactulose alone (Group L, n = 7); and negative for pectin, cellulose, and lactulose (Group N, n = 3). Individual differences were noted in subjects from Group LP and Group L. The detection frequency of lecithinase-negative clostridia was higher in Group LP than in the other groups (P < 0.05), and the detection frequency and the number of lecithinase-positive clostridia were higher in Groups LP and L than in Group N (P < 0.05). These findings suggest that the Clostridium species are associated with hydrogen production. The hydrogen breath test results of DFs depend on both the type of DF and the individual colonic microflora. The amount and constitution of colonic microflora might be predicted by the hydrogen-breath test using different DFs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15284370     DOI: 10.1093/jn/134.8.1881

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nutr        ISSN: 0022-3166            Impact factor:   4.798


  13 in total

1.  Nutritional strategy to prevent fatty liver and insulin resistance independent of obesity by reducing glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide responses in mice.

Authors:  Farnaz Keyhani-Nejad; Martin Irmler; Frank Isken; Eva K Wirth; Johannes Beckers; Andreas L Birkenfeld; Andreas F H Pfeiffer
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 10.122

2.  Inverse dose effect of pretest dietary lactose intake on breath hydrogen results and symptoms in lactase nonpersistent subjects.

Authors:  Andrew Szilagyi; Paula Malolepszy; Samara Yesovitch; Usha Nathwani; Christina Vinokuroff; Albert Cohen; Xiaoqing Xue
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  The Microbiome and p-Inulin in Hemodialysis: A Feasibility Study.

Authors:  Dominic S Raj; Michael B Sohn; David M Charytan; Jonathan Himmelfarb; T Alp Ikizler; Rajnish Mehrotra; Ali Ramezani; Renu Regunathan-Shenk; Jesse Y Hsu; J Richard Landis; Hongzhe Li; Paul L Kimmel; Alan S Kliger; Laura M Dember
Journal:  Kidney360       Date:  2021-01-15

4.  Mucus-degrading Bacteroides link carbapenems to aggravated graft-versus-host disease.

Authors:  Eiko Hayase; Tomo Hayase; Mohamed A Jamal; Takahiko Miyama; Chia-Chi Chang; Miriam R Ortega; Saira S Ahmed; Jennifer L Karmouch; Christopher A Sanchez; Alexandria N Brown; Rawan K El-Himri; Ivonne I Flores; Lauren K McDaniel; Dung Pham; Taylor Halsey; Annette C Frenk; Valerie A Chapa; Brooke E Heckel; Yimei Jin; Wen-Bin Tsai; Rishika Prasad; Lin Tan; Lucas Veillon; Nadim J Ajami; Jennifer A Wargo; Jessica Galloway-Peña; Samuel Shelburne; Roy F Chemaly; Lauren Davey; Robert W P Glowacki; Chen Liu; Gabriela Rondon; Amin M Alousi; Jeffrey J Molldrem; Richard E Champlin; Elizabeth J Shpall; Raphael H Valdivia; Eric C Martens; Philip L Lorenzi; Robert R Jenq
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 66.850

5.  Correlation of Gut Microbiota Composition with Resistance to Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis in Rats.

Authors:  Suzana Stanisavljević; Jovanka Lukić; Svetlana Soković; Sanja Mihajlovic; Marija Mostarica Stojković; Djordje Miljković; Natasa Golić
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-12-15       Impact factor: 5.640

6.  Comparison of (R)-ketamine and lanicemine on depression-like phenotype and abnormal composition of gut microbiota in a social defeat stress model.

Authors:  Youge Qu; Chun Yang; Qian Ren; Min Ma; Chao Dong; Kenji Hashimoto
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-16       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Effects of Iron and Zinc Biofortified Foods on Gut Microbiota In Vivo (Gallus gallus): A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Mariana Juste Contin Gomes; Hércia Stampini Duarte Martino; Elad Tako
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-01-09       Impact factor: 5.717

8.  Transplantation of High Hydrogen-Producing Microbiota Leads to Generation of Large Amounts of Colonic Hydrogen in Recipient Rats Fed High Amylose Maize Starch.

Authors:  Naomichi Nishimura; Hiroki Tanabe; Erika Komori; Yumi Sasaki; Ryo Inoue; Tatsuro Yamamoto
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 5.717

9.  Alfalfa Intervention Alters Rumen Microbial Community Development in Hu Lambs During Early Life.

Authors:  Bin Yang; Jiaqing Le; Peng Wu; Jianxin Liu; Le L Guan; Jiakun Wang
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 5.640

10.  Distribution of microbiota across different intestinal tract segments of a stranded dwarf minke whale, Balaenoptera acutorostrata.

Authors:  Jiashen Tian; Jing Du; Zhichuang Lu; Jiabo Han; Zhen Wang; Duohui Li; Xiaoyan Guan; Zhaohui Wang
Journal:  Microbiologyopen       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 3.139

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.