OBJECTIVES: We sought to characterize a region of apparent systolic flow resembling mitral regurgitation (MR) in patients with mechanical disk mitral prostheses as artifact. BACKGROUND: Diagnosing MR in the presence of mechanical prostheses is challenging. Occasionally, important MR is suggested by a substantial region of systolic Doppler color flow in an acoustically shadowed region of the left atrium when, in fact, only trace MR exists. We hypothesized this pseudo-MR is caused by acoustic mirroring of the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) flow by sound reflected off the prosthesis, projecting flow into the left atrium because of longer transit time. METHODS: We reviewed 19 patients with mechanical mitral valves and trace MR by transesophageal echocardiography who had transthoracic echocardiography studies within 1 week (group A), and prospectively studied 22 consecutive patients by transthoracic echocardiography with subtle transducer angulation variation to detect pseudo-MR and characterize it by pulsed Doppler (group B). RESULTS: In group A, 12 of 19 patients had evidence of pseudo-MR on review of their transthoracic echocardiograms, absent by transesophageal echocardiography. In group B, this pseudo-MR signal was present in 13 of 22 patients, with velocity and timing by pulsed Doppler comparable with LVOT flow (onset at 125 +/- 27 milliseconds vs 135 +/- 11 milliseconds from QRS, P = not significant). The angle between the mitral plane and the LVOT, which determines whether this mirroring can occur, was smaller for patients with pseudo-MR. CONCLUSION: Artifactual pseudo-MR is often seen with mechanical mitral prostheses. Its behavior and sensitivity to geometric relationships are consistent with mirroring of LVOT flow. Practically, potential misdiagnosis can be readily avoided by pulsed Doppler sampling, sparing the patient further procedures.
OBJECTIVES: We sought to characterize a region of apparent systolic flow resembling mitral regurgitation (MR) in patients with mechanical disk mitral prostheses as artifact. BACKGROUND: Diagnosing MR in the presence of mechanical prostheses is challenging. Occasionally, important MR is suggested by a substantial region of systolic Doppler color flow in an acoustically shadowed region of the left atrium when, in fact, only trace MR exists. We hypothesized this pseudo-MR is caused by acoustic mirroring of the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) flow by sound reflected off the prosthesis, projecting flow into the left atrium because of longer transit time. METHODS: We reviewed 19 patients with mechanical mitral valves and trace MR by transesophageal echocardiography who had transthoracic echocardiography studies within 1 week (group A), and prospectively studied 22 consecutive patients by transthoracic echocardiography with subtle transducer angulation variation to detect pseudo-MR and characterize it by pulsed Doppler (group B). RESULTS: In group A, 12 of 19 patients had evidence of pseudo-MR on review of their transthoracic echocardiograms, absent by transesophageal echocardiography. In group B, this pseudo-MR signal was present in 13 of 22 patients, with velocity and timing by pulsed Doppler comparable with LVOT flow (onset at 125 +/- 27 milliseconds vs 135 +/- 11 milliseconds from QRS, P = not significant). The angle between the mitral plane and the LVOT, which determines whether this mirroring can occur, was smaller for patients with pseudo-MR. CONCLUSION: Artifactual pseudo-MR is often seen with mechanical mitral prostheses. Its behavior and sensitivity to geometric relationships are consistent with mirroring of LVOT flow. Practically, potential misdiagnosis can be readily avoided by pulsed Doppler sampling, sparing the patient further procedures.
Authors: M Nowak; P Rosenberger; T W Felbinger; A E Götz; S K Shernan; K Unertl; H K Eltzschig Journal: Anaesthesist Date: 2006-03 Impact factor: 1.041
Authors: Philippe B Bertrand; Robert A Levine; Eric M Isselbacher; Pieter M Vandervoort Journal: J Am Soc Echocardiogr Date: 2016-03-09 Impact factor: 5.251