Literature DB >> 15281121

Protein contact prediction using patterns of correlation.

Nicholas Hamilton1, Kevin Burrage, Mark A Ragan, Thomas Huber.   

Abstract

We describe a new method for using neural networks to predict residue contact pairs in a protein. The main inputs to the neural network are a set of 25 measures of correlated mutation between all pairs of residues in two "windows" of size 5 centered on the residues of interest. While the individual pair-wise correlations are a relatively weak predictor of contact, by training the network on windows of correlation the accuracy of prediction is significantly improved. The neural network is trained on a set of 100 proteins and then tested on a disjoint set of 1033 proteins of known structure. An average predictive accuracy of 21.7% is obtained taking the best L/2 predictions for each protein, where L is the sequence length. Taking the best L/10 predictions gives an average accuracy of 30.7%. The predictor is also tested on a set of 59 proteins from the CASP5 experiment. The accuracy is found to be relatively consistent across different sequence lengths, but to vary widely according to the secondary structure. Predictive accuracy is also found to improve by using multiple sequence alignments containing many sequences to calculate the correlations. Copyright 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15281121     DOI: 10.1002/prot.20160

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  27 in total

1.  Accurate de novo structure prediction of large transmembrane protein domains using fragment-assembly and correlated mutation analysis.

Authors:  Timothy Nugent; David T Jones
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Genomics-aided structure prediction.

Authors:  Joanna I Sułkowska; Faruck Morcos; Martin Weigt; Terence Hwa; José N Onuchic
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-06-12       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Use of secondary structural information and C alpha-C alpha distance restraints to model protein structures with MODELLER.

Authors:  Boojala V B Reddy; Yiannis N Kaznessis
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 1.826

4.  A comprehensive assessment of sequence-based and template-based methods for protein contact prediction.

Authors:  Sitao Wu; Yang Zhang
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-02-22       Impact factor: 6.937

5.  Using multi-data hidden Markov models trained on local neighborhoods of protein structure to predict residue-residue contacts.

Authors:  Patrik Björkholm; Pawel Daniluk; Andriy Kryshtafovych; Krzysztof Fidelis; Robin Andersson; Torgeir R Hvidsten
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-03-16       Impact factor: 6.937

6.  BCL::contact-low confidence fold recognition hits boost protein contact prediction and de novo structure determination.

Authors:  Mert Karakaş; Nils Woetzel; Jens Meiler
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.479

7.  Predicting protein residue-residue contacts using deep networks and boosting.

Authors:  Jesse Eickholt; Jianlin Cheng
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 6.937

8.  NNcon: improved protein contact map prediction using 2D-recursive neural networks.

Authors:  Allison N Tegge; Zheng Wang; Jesse Eickholt; Jianlin Cheng
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-05-06       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Prediction of protein long-range contacts using an ensemble of genetic algorithm classifiers with sequence profile centers.

Authors:  Peng Chen; Jinyan Li
Journal:  BMC Struct Biol       Date:  2010-05-17

10.  Towards accurate residue-residue hydrophobic contact prediction for alpha helical proteins via integer linear optimization.

Authors:  R Rajgaria; S R McAllister; C A Floudas
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2009-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.