BACKGROUND: Heavy colonization with group B streptococcus (GBS) has been associated with increased risk of preterm birth and neonatal sepsis; the burden of neonatal GBS disease varies geographically. To determine whether variation in heavy colonization and GBS serotypes could contribute to geographic differences in disease burden, we assessed the prevalence of heavy colonization and the distribution of serotypes in asymptomatic pregnant women in multiple countries. METHODS: Cervical, lower vaginal and urine samples were collected from women attending seven prenatal clinics in six countries. Light colonization was defined as GBS isolation from Lim broth only; heavy colonization was isolation from urine or sheep blood agar plates. Isolates were serotyped using capillary precipitation. RESULTS: GBS was present in 11.3% of 1308 participants (range 7.1-21.7%); 5.0% were heavily colonized (0.4-18.8%) and 6.4% were lightly colonized (2.9-8.0%). Serotypes III and V were most common (both 17.2%). Serotypes VII and VIII were found in one study center. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of heavy colonization and GBS serotypes varied significantly among our study centers. Whether this variation could in part explain geographic differences in neonatal morbidity and mortality is a hypothesis that needs further study.
BACKGROUND: Heavy colonization with group B streptococcus (GBS) has been associated with increased risk of preterm birth and neonatal sepsis; the burden of neonatal GBS disease varies geographically. To determine whether variation in heavy colonization and GBS serotypes could contribute to geographic differences in disease burden, we assessed the prevalence of heavy colonization and the distribution of serotypes in asymptomatic pregnant women in multiple countries. METHODS: Cervical, lower vaginal and urine samples were collected from women attending seven prenatal clinics in six countries. Light colonization was defined as GBS isolation from Lim broth only; heavy colonization was isolation from urine or sheep blood agar plates. Isolates were serotyped using capillary precipitation. RESULTS:GBS was present in 11.3% of 1308 participants (range 7.1-21.7%); 5.0% were heavily colonized (0.4-18.8%) and 6.4% were lightly colonized (2.9-8.0%). Serotypes III and V were most common (both 17.2%). Serotypes VII and VIII were found in one study center. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of heavy colonization and GBS serotypes varied significantly among our study centers. Whether this variation could in part explain geographic differences in neonatal morbidity and mortality is a hypothesis that needs further study.
Authors: Tamsin R Sheen; Alyssa Jimenez; Nai-Yu Wang; Anirban Banerjee; Nina M van Sorge; Kelly S Doran Journal: J Bacteriol Date: 2011-10-07 Impact factor: 3.490
Authors: Kimberly B Ulett; William H Benjamin; Fenglin Zhuo; Meng Xiao; Fanrong Kong; Gwendolyn L Gilbert; Mark A Schembri; Glen C Ulett Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2009-05-13 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Nai-Yu Wang; Kathryn A Patras; Ho Seong Seo; Courtney K Cavaco; Berenice Rösler; Melody N Neely; Paul M Sullam; Kelly S Doran Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2014-03-11 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Christopher J Gill; Jose B V Mantaring; William B Macleod; Myrna Mendoza; Sookee Mendoza; W Charles Huskins; Donald A Goldmann; Davidson H Hamer Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2009-01-01 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Deepak S Ipe; Nouri L Ben Zakour; Matthew J Sullivan; Scott A Beatson; Kimberly B Ulett; William H Benjamin; Mark R Davies; Samantha J Dando; Nathan P King; Allan W Cripps; Mark A Schembri; Gordon Dougan; Glen C Ulett Journal: Infect Immun Date: 2015-11-09 Impact factor: 3.441
Authors: Donna A Santillan; Karishma K Rai; Mark K Santillan; Yogita Krishnamachari; Aliasger K Salem; Stephen K Hunter Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2011-06-15 Impact factor: 10.693
Authors: Danielle L Ippolito; Wesley A James; Deborah Tinnemore; Raywin R Huang; Mary J Dehart; Julie Williams; Mark A Wingerd; Samandra T Demons Journal: BMC Infect Dis Date: 2010-11-24 Impact factor: 3.090