Literature DB >> 15279801

Network responses to DNA damaging agents.

Thomas J Begley1, Leona D Samson.   

Abstract

Global transcriptional profiling and large scale phenotypic studies have shown that eukaryotic cells mount a robust and complex response to damage. Further, systems biology approaches have employed powerful analytical methods to integrate global data sets with regulatory sequences, protein-DNA and protein-protein interactions, which have led to the identification of large networked responses to damage. A number of groups have shown that damage responsive networks embrace groups of highly connected genes and proteins and have illustrated that multiple interconnected cellular pathways respond to damage and moreover, dictate viability post damage. This review highlights some of the global studies that examine cellular responses to damage, and proposes that we should be moving from pathways to networks, in order to gain better insight into cellular defense mechanisms.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15279801     DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2004.03.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)        ISSN: 1568-7856


  16 in total

1.  A systems approach to delineate functions of paralogous transcription factors: role of the Yap family in the DNA damage response.

Authors:  Kai Tan; Hoda Feizi; Colin Luo; Stephanie H Fan; Timothy Ravasi; Trey G Ideker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-02-19       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Inhibition of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 by arsenite interferes with repair of oxidative DNA damage.

Authors:  Wei Ding; Wenlan Liu; Karen L Cooper; Xu-Jun Qin; Patrícia L de Souza Bergo; Laurie G Hudson; Ke Jian Liu
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2008-12-03       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 3.  Transcriptional modulation induced by ionizing radiation: p53 remains a central player.

Authors:  Sharon Rashi-Elkeles; Ran Elkon; Seagull Shavit; Yaniv Lerenthal; Chaim Linhart; Ana Kupershtein; Ninette Amariglio; Gideon Rechavi; Ron Shamir; Yosef Shiloh
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2011-07-07       Impact factor: 6.603

4.  An overview of Cdk1-controlled targets and processes.

Authors:  Jorrit M Enserink; Richard D Kolodner
Journal:  Cell Div       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 5.130

5.  A systems biology approach to identify molecular pathways altered by HDAC inhibition in osteosarcoma.

Authors:  Luke A Wittenburg; Andrey A Ptitsyn; Douglas H Thamm
Journal:  J Cell Biochem       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 4.429

6.  DNA damage-induced reactive oxygen species (ROS) stress response in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Lori A Rowe; Natalya Degtyareva; Paul W Doetsch
Journal:  Free Radic Biol Med       Date:  2008-07-30       Impact factor: 7.376

7.  SUMO-2 Orchestrates Chromatin Modifiers in Response to DNA Damage.

Authors:  Ivo A Hendriks; Louise W Treffers; Matty Verlaan-de Vries; Jesper V Olsen; Alfred C O Vertegaal
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 9.423

8.  Bacillus subtilis polynucleotide phosphorylase 3'-to-5' DNase activity is involved in DNA repair.

Authors:  Paula P Cardenas; Begoña Carrasco; Humberto Sanchez; Gintaras Deikus; David H Bechhofer; Juan C Alonso
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-05-11       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Sugar metabolism, redox balance and oxidative stress response in the respiratory yeast Kluyveromyces lactis.

Authors:  M Isabel González-Siso; Ana García-Leiro; Nuria Tarrío; M Esperanza Cerdán
Journal:  Microb Cell Fact       Date:  2009-08-30       Impact factor: 5.328

10.  Construction and application of a protein and genetic interaction network (yeast interactome).

Authors:  Gregory R Stuart; William C Copeland; Micheline K Strand
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-03-09       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.