| Literature DB >> 15279531 |
Kim T Mueser1, Robin E Clark, Michael Haines, Robert E Drake, Gregory J McHugo, Gary R Bond, Susan M Essock, Deborah R Becker, Rosemarie Wolfe, Karin Swain.
Abstract
The authors compared 3 approaches to vocational rehabilitation for severe mental illness (SMI): the individual placement and support (IPS) model of supported employment, a psychosocial rehabilitation (PSR) program, and standard services. Two hundred four unemployed clients (46% African American, 30% Latino) with SMI were randomly assigned to IPS, PSR, or standard services and followed for 2 years. Clients in IPS had significantly better employment outcomes than clients in PSR and standard services, including more competitive work (73.9% vs. 18.2% vs. 27.5%, respectively) and any paid work (73.9% vs. 34.8% vs. 53.6%, respectively). There were few differences in nonvocational outcomes between programs. IPS is a more effective model than PSR or standard brokered vocational services for improving employment outcomes in clients with SMI. (c) 2004 APA, all rights reservedEntities:
Mesh:
Year: 2004 PMID: 15279531 DOI: 10.1037/0022-006X.72.3.479
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Consult Clin Psychol ISSN: 0022-006X