Literature DB >> 15279531

The Hartford study of supported employment for persons with severe mental illness.

Kim T Mueser1, Robin E Clark, Michael Haines, Robert E Drake, Gregory J McHugo, Gary R Bond, Susan M Essock, Deborah R Becker, Rosemarie Wolfe, Karin Swain.   

Abstract

The authors compared 3 approaches to vocational rehabilitation for severe mental illness (SMI): the individual placement and support (IPS) model of supported employment, a psychosocial rehabilitation (PSR) program, and standard services. Two hundred four unemployed clients (46% African American, 30% Latino) with SMI were randomly assigned to IPS, PSR, or standard services and followed for 2 years. Clients in IPS had significantly better employment outcomes than clients in PSR and standard services, including more competitive work (73.9% vs. 18.2% vs. 27.5%, respectively) and any paid work (73.9% vs. 34.8% vs. 53.6%, respectively). There were few differences in nonvocational outcomes between programs. IPS is a more effective model than PSR or standard brokered vocational services for improving employment outcomes in clients with SMI. (c) 2004 APA, all rights reserved

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15279531     DOI: 10.1037/0022-006X.72.3.479

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol        ISSN: 0022-006X


  48 in total

1.  Randomized controlled trial of supported employment in England: 2 year follow-up of the Supported Work and Needs (SWAN) study.

Authors:  Margaret Heslin; Louise Howard; Morven Leese; Paul McCrone; Christopher Rice; Manuela Jarrett; Terry Spokes; Peter Huxley; Graham Thornicroft
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 49.548

2.  Generalizability of the Individual Placement and Support (IPS) model of supported employment outside the US.

Authors:  Gary R Bond; Robert E Drake; Deborah R Becker
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 49.548

3.  Social value of supported employment for psychosocial program participants.

Authors:  Paul J Barreira; Miriam Cohen Tepper; Paul B Gold; Dana Holley; Cathaleene Macias
Journal:  Psychiatr Q       Date:  2011-03

Review 4.  Economic considerations associated with assertive community treatment and supported employment for people with severe mental illness.

Authors:  Eric Latimer
Journal:  J Psychiatry Neurosci       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 6.186

5.  Supported employment outcomes of a randomized controlled trial of ACT and clubhouse models.

Authors:  Cathaleene Macias; Charles F Rodican; William A Hargreaves; Danson R Jones; Paul J Barreira; Qi Wang
Journal:  Psychiatr Serv       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.084

6.  Who benefits from supported employment: a meta-analytic study.

Authors:  Kikuko Campbell; Gary R Bond; Robert E Drake
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2009-08-06       Impact factor: 9.306

7.  Supported employment for adults with severe mental illness.

Authors:  Yoshihiro Kinoshita; Toshi A Furukawa; Ichiro M Omori; Norio Watanabe; Max Marshall; Gary R Bond; Peter Huxley; David Kingdon
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010

8.  Contemporary approaches in mental health rehabilitation.

Authors:  L van der Meer; C Wunderink
Journal:  Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci       Date:  2018-07-25       Impact factor: 6.892

9.  Supported Employment for Middle-Aged and Older People with Schizophrenia.

Authors:  Elizabeth W Twamley; Jenille M Narvaez; Deborah R Becker; Stephen J Bartels; Dilip V Jeste
Journal:  Am J Psychiatr Rehabil       Date:  2008-01

10.  Using the Social Enterprise Intervention (SEI) and Individual Placement and Support (IPS) models to improve employment and clinical outcomes of homeless youth with mental illness.

Authors:  Kristin M Ferguson
Journal:  Soc Work Ment Health       Date:  2013-09-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.