Literature DB >> 15279340

Maternal satisfaction to epidural and spinal anesthesia for cesarean section.

Wacharin Sindhvananda1, Ruenreong Leelanukrom, Oraluxna Rodanant, Pin Sriprajittichai.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
OBJECTIVE: The differences between epidural (EA) and spinal (SA) anesthesia that can affect maternal satisfaction are the procedures, quality of anesthesia and postoperative events. Dominantly, postoperative events such as postdural puncture headache, pruritus and nausea or vomiting after spinal anesthesia are claimed to be its disadvantages. However, maternal satisfactory perception to theses two techniques has not been revealed. The authors' purpose was to compare maternal satisfaction regarding the techniques and their outcomes between EA and SA by the developed valid and reliable tool. MATERIAL AND
METHOD: Patients were randomly classified into two groups: epidural (Group E, n=56) and spinal (Group S, n = 58). Epidural and spinal anesthesia were administered with bupivacaine, 20 mL 0.5% with 1:200,000 epinephrine combined with two doses of 5 mg morphine and hyperbaric bupivacaine 2.2-2.4 mL 0.5% combined with 0.2 mg morphine respectively. Guidelines for treatment of intraoperative and postoperative events, which might be the confounding factors, were set up. Maternal satisfaction was evaluated by the 11-item, qualified, self-administered questionnaire comprised of 4 common factors. The score of 0-10 Visual analog scale was used to access the degree of satisfaction. Trained personnel performed data collections in the post-anesthesia care unit and ward. The means of the factor and total satisfaction scores were compared between the two groups by Mann Whitney U test. A p-value < 0.05 considered significant.
RESULTS: There was no statistical difference in the factor scores between the two groups. The total satisfactory score was 89.48 +/- 9.31 and 90.03 +/- 11.26 in Group E and S respectively. No statistical difference of the total satisfaction score was detected.
CONCLUSION: There was no difference in maternal satisfaction regarding to the techniques and the outcomes between EA and SA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15279340

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Assoc Thai        ISSN: 0125-2208


  5 in total

1.  Factors in patient dissatisfaction and refusal regarding spinal anesthesia.

Authors:  Won Ji Rhee; Chan Jong Chung; Youn Hee Lim; Kyu Han Lee; Seung Cheol Lee
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2010-10-21

2.  Assessment of Maternal Satisfaction and Associated Factors among Parturients Who Underwent Cesarean Delivery under Spinal Anesthesia at University of Gondar Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, Northwest Ethiopia, 2019.

Authors:  Samuel Debas Bayable; Seid Adem Ahmed; Girmay Fitiwi Lema; Debas Yaregal Melesse
Journal:  Anesthesiol Res Pract       Date:  2020-10-12

3.  Survey on maternal satisfaction in receiving spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section.

Authors:  T Kumaravadivel Dharmalingam; Nor Azian Ahmad Zainuddin
Journal:  Malays J Med Sci       Date:  2013-05

4.  A randomized double-blind comparison of the double-space technique versus the single-space technique in combined spinal-epidural anesthesia for cesarean section.

Authors:  Eun Hee Chun; Sooyoung Cho; Jae Hee Woo; Youn Jin Kim
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 2.217

5.  Study of patient satisfaction and self-expressed problems after emergency caesarean delivery under subarachnoid block.

Authors:  Vr Hemanth Kumar; Sameer M Jahagirdar; Umesh Kumar Athiraman; R Sripriya; S Parthasarathy; M Ravishankar
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2014-03
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.