PURPOSE: This study sought to examine 1) temporal changes in psychologic functioning over 12 months and 2) baseline differences in mental health and social service needs between orofacial injury patients and sociodemographically comparable controls undergoing elective oral surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prospective, case-control study of patients treated at a public hospital in Los Angeles, CA. A total of 336 subjects with mandible fractures and 119 subjects undergoing elective removal of their third molars participated in structured, repeated follow-up assessments (10 days, 6 months, and 12 months after their surgical procedures). Multiple imputation was used to manage incomplete data, and propensity score analysis was used to correct for covariate imbalances between the injury and the control cohort. A series of ANOVAs, chi(2) analyses, and odds ratios was conducted. RESULTS: The injury patients continue to experience significant psychologic distress for up to 12 months following the traumatic event. Orofacial injury patients also tend to report more lifetime and current mental health and social service needs than the sociodemographically similar elective-surgery cohort. CONCLUSION: The management of facial injuries in disadvantaged individuals should integrate case management that addresses psychosocial sequelae and service needs of patients.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: This study sought to examine 1) temporal changes in psychologic functioning over 12 months and 2) baseline differences in mental health and social service needs between orofacial injurypatients and sociodemographically comparable controls undergoing elective oral surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prospective, case-control study of patients treated at a public hospital in Los Angeles, CA. A total of 336 subjects with mandible fractures and 119 subjects undergoing elective removal of their third molars participated in structured, repeated follow-up assessments (10 days, 6 months, and 12 months after their surgical procedures). Multiple imputation was used to manage incomplete data, and propensity score analysis was used to correct for covariate imbalances between the injury and the control cohort. A series of ANOVAs, chi(2) analyses, and odds ratios was conducted. RESULTS: The injurypatients continue to experience significant psychologic distress for up to 12 months following the traumatic event. Orofacial injurypatients also tend to report more lifetime and current mental health and social service needs than the sociodemographically similar elective-surgery cohort. CONCLUSION: The management of facial injuries in disadvantaged individuals should integrate case management that addresses psychosocial sequelae and service needs of patients.
Authors: Eunice C Wong; Grant N Marshall; Vivek Shetty; Annie Zhou; Howard Belzberg; Dennis-Duke R Yamashita Journal: Gen Hosp Psychiatry Date: 2007 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 3.238
Authors: Anita Chandra; Grant N Marshall; Vivek Shetty; Susan M Paddock; Eunice C Wong; Douglas Zatzick; George Luo; Dennis-Duke R Yamashita Journal: J Trauma Date: 2008-07