Literature DB >> 15278853

Facial computed tomography use in trauma patients who require a head computed tomogram.

Eric P Holmgren1, Eric J Dierks, Louis D Homer, Bryce E Potter.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Head-injured patients admitted to a trauma center may or may not have associated facial fractures. Most head-injured patients undergo head computed tomography (CT) scan early in their evaluation. The question of adding a facial CT at the time of the head CT can be unclear. The aims of our study are 1) to analyze how the facial CT is used in conjunction with the head CT in facial fracture trauma patients, 2) to recognize unique identifiers that would aid the surgeon's decision-making process to order a facial CT in continuity with a head CT, and 3) to examine what is characteristic of head trauma patients who receive a facial CT separately, at some point after the head CT. Materials and methods Data were retrospectively reviewed for a 5-year period at a level I trauma center in which all patients who present with craniomaxillofacial trauma are managed by the oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMFS) service. Included patients must have obtained a head CT during initial resuscitation and be diagnosed with a facial fracture during the same hospital stay. These patients were divided into 3 groups: those who had a 1) head CT only, 2) head CT and facial CT at the same time, and 3) head CT with the facial CT performed at a later time.
RESULTS: A total of 9,871 patients were admitted to the trauma service during a 5-year period and 4,926 patients (49.9%) had head CT performed. Of this group, 12% had facial fractures, and the most common associated injury in this group was facial lacerations and concussions. The nasal fracture followed by the orbital fracture was the most common fracture type. Eighty-four percent of the time, the facial CT was used to help diagnose facial fractures in this patient population. The 3 different groups showed unique trends.
CONCLUSION: Six points were identified in our study that can augment the physical examination in patients who require head CT. The following points can help prompt the clinician to order a combination head and facial CT: 1) 12% of trauma patients who require a head CT will have a facial fracture, whereas half of these patients will have multiple facial fractures. 2) Orbital fractures are commonly missed in this group and often require a secondary scan such as coronal views for accurate diagnosis. 3) Facial lacerations correlate with ordering a combination head and facial CT. 4) The most common facial fracture identified among patients receiving a trauma head CT is the nasal fracture. 5) The use of the facial CT in more severely injured patients tended to be delayed and was related to increased hospital and intensive care unit days. 6) Only 16% of facial fracture patients who had received an initial trauma head CT did not require further facial CT scanning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15278853     DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2003.12.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0278-2391            Impact factor:   1.895


  9 in total

1.  [S3 guideline on treatment of polytrauma/severe injuries. Trauma room care].

Authors:  S Lendemans; S Ruchholtz
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.000

2.  Head Computed Tomography Versus Maxillofacial Computed Tomography: An Evaluation of the Efficacy of Facial Imaging in the Detection of Facial Fractures.

Authors:  Zachary Gala; Di Bai; Jordan Halsey; Haripriya Ayyala; Kristin Riddle; Julien Hohenleitner; Ian Hoppe; Edward Lee; Mark Granick
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2022-06-20

3.  A comparable study of the diagnostic performance of orbital ultrasonography and CBCT in patients with suspected orbital floor fractures.

Authors:  Masoumeh Johari; Mohammad Ali Ghavimi; Hediyeh Mahmoudian; Reza Javadrashid; Simin Mirakhor Samani; Daniel F Fouladi
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 2.419

4.  Validation of the "Wisconsin Criteria" for Obtaining Dedicated Facial Imaging and Its Financial Impact at a Level 1 Trauma Center.

Authors:  Christopher N Stewart; Lily Wood; Ruth Jo Barta
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2020-03-15

5.  Maxillofacial injuries among trauma patients undergoing head computerized tomography; A Ugandan experience.

Authors:  Ullas Chandrika Krishnan; Rosemary Kusaba Byanyima; Ameda Faith; Adriane Kamulegeya
Journal:  Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci       Date:  2017 Oct-Dec

6.  Unique tooth dislocation into submental space during a pan facial trauma - Importance of an orthopantomogram.

Authors:  Shahi Jahan Shah; Ibrahim Alshahrani; Ashfaq Yaqoob; Rafi A Togoo; Abdullah A Alnazeh; Muhammad Ishfaq Khan
Journal:  Trauma Case Rep       Date:  2020-04-18

7.  A clinical decision aid to discern patients without and with midfacial and mandibular fractures that require treatment (the REDUCTION-II study): a prospective multicentre cohort study.

Authors:  Romke Rozema; Mostafa El Moumni; Gysbert T de Vries; Frederik K L Spijkervet; René Verbeek; Jurrijn Y J Kleinbergen; Bas W J Bens; Michiel H J Doff; Baucke van Minnen
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 2.374

8.  Use of therapeutic non-refractive contact lenses to improve visual outcome after repair of traumatic corneal wounds.

Authors:  Mohammad M Khater
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-08-28

Review 9.  Management of orbital fractures: challenges and solutions.

Authors:  Jennings R Boyette; John D Pemberton; Juliana Bonilla-Velez
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-11-17
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.