Literature DB >> 15278451

Neurogenesis in the chilopod Lithobius forficatus suggests more similarities to chelicerates than to insects.

Diana Kadner1, Angelika Stollewerk.   

Abstract

In a recent comparative study on neurogenesis in the diplopod Glomeris marginata we have shown that the millipede and the spider share several features that cannot be found in homologous form in insects and crustaceans. The most distinctive difference is that groups of neural precursors are singled out from the neuroectoderm of the spider and the diplopod, rather than individual cells (i.e. neuroblasts) as in insects or crustacean. This observation constitutes the first morphological indication for a close myriapod/chelicerate relationship that has otherwise only been suggested by molecular phylogenetic analysis. To see whether the pattern of neurogenesis described for the diplopod is representative for myriapods, we analysed neurogenesis in the basal chilopod Lithobius forficatus. We show here that groups of cells invaginate from the chilopod neuroectoderm at strikingly similar positions as the invaginating cell groups of the diplopod and the spider. Furthermore, the expression patterns of the proneural and neurogenic genes reveal more similarities to the chelicerate and the diplopod than to insects. Thus, chelicerates and myriapods share the developmental mechanism for neurogenesis, either because they are true sister groups, or because this reflects the ancestral state of neurogenesis in arthropods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15278451     DOI: 10.1007/s00427-004-0419-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev Genes Evol        ISSN: 0949-944X            Impact factor:   0.900


  28 in total

Review 1.  Notch signaling in the nervous system. Pieces still missing from the puzzle.

Authors:  N E Baker
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 4.345

2.  Diplopod hemocyanin sequence and the phylogenetic position of the Myriapoda.

Authors:  K Kusche; T Burmester
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 16.240

3.  Mitochondrial protein phylogeny joins myriapods with chelicerates.

Authors:  U W Hwang; M Friedrich; D Tautz; C J Park; W Kim
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-09-13       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  The midline of the Drosophila central nervous system: a model for the genetic analysis of cell fate, cell migration, and growth cone guidance.

Authors:  C Klämbt; J R Jacobs; C S Goodman
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1991-02-22       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  Morphological disparity in the cambrian.

Authors:  D E Briggs; R A Fortey; M A Wills
Journal:  Science       Date:  1992-06-19       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  The position of arthropods in the animal kingdom: a search for a reliable outgroup for internal arthropod phylogeny.

Authors:  G Giribet; C Ribera
Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 4.286

Review 7.  Molecular phylogeny of the animal kingdom.

Authors:  K G Field; G J Olsen; D J Lane; S J Giovannoni; M T Ghiselin; E C Raff; N R Pace; R A Raff
Journal:  Science       Date:  1988-02-12       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Comparative analysis of neurogenesis in the myriapod Glomeris marginata (Diplopoda) suggests more similarities to chelicerates than to insects.

Authors:  Hilary Dove; Angelika Stollewerk
Journal:  Development       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 6.868

9.  Electron microscopic analysis of Drosophila midline glia during embryogenesis and larval development using beta-galactosidase expression as endogenous cell marker.

Authors:  A Stollewerk; C Klămbt; R Cantera
Journal:  Microsc Res Tech       Date:  1996-10-15       Impact factor: 2.769

10.  Evidence from 12S ribosomal RNA sequences that onychophorans are modified arthropods.

Authors:  J W Ballard; G J Olsen; D P Faith; W A Odgers; D M Rowell; P W Atkinson
Journal:  Science       Date:  1992-11-20       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  26 in total

Review 1.  Evolving specialization of the arthropod nervous system.

Authors:  Erin Jarvis; Heather S Bruce; Nipam H Patel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  One of the main forces that advance all fields of scientific inquiry is the establishment of unifying principles.

Authors:  Volker Hartenstein; Diethard Tautz
Journal:  Dev Genes Evol       Date:  2004-11-19       Impact factor: 0.900

Review 3.  From variable to constant cell numbers: cellular characteristics of the arthropod nervous system argue against a sister-group relationship of Chelicerata and "Myriapoda" but favour the Mandibulata concept.

Authors:  Steffen Harzsch; Carsten H G Müller; Harald Wolf
Journal:  Dev Genes Evol       Date:  2004-12-09       Impact factor: 0.900

Review 4.  The evolution of arthropod heads: reconciling morphological, developmental and palaeontological evidence.

Authors:  Gerhard Scholtz; Gregory D Edgecombe
Journal:  Dev Genes Evol       Date:  2006-06-28       Impact factor: 0.900

5.  The expression pattern of genes involved in early neurogenesis suggests distinct and conserved functions in the diplopod Glomeris marginata.

Authors:  Hilary L Pioro; Angelika Stollewerk
Journal:  Dev Genes Evol       Date:  2006-05-25       Impact factor: 0.900

6.  Notch signaling does not regulate segmentation in the honeybee, Apis mellifera.

Authors:  Megan J Wilson; Benjamin H McKelvey; Susan van der Heide; Peter K Dearden
Journal:  Dev Genes Evol       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 0.900

7.  Velvet worm development links myriapods with chelicerates.

Authors:  Georg Mayer; Paul M Whitington
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-07-29       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Gene expression during postembryonic segmentation in the centipede Lithobius peregrinus (Chilopoda, Lithobiomorpha).

Authors:  Francesca Bortolin; Clara Benna; Giuseppe Fusco
Journal:  Dev Genes Evol       Date:  2011-04-09       Impact factor: 0.900

9.  Identification, distribution and molecular evolution of the pacifastin gene family in Metazoa.

Authors:  Bert Breugelmans; Gert Simonet; Vincent van Hoef; Sofie Van Soest; Jozef Vanden Broeck
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2009-05-12       Impact factor: 3.260

10.  Can comprehensive background knowledge be incorporated into substitution models to improve phylogenetic analyses? A case study on major arthropod relationships.

Authors:  Björn M von Reumont; Karen Meusemann; Nikolaus U Szucsich; Emiliano Dell'Ampio; Vivek Gowri-Shankar; Daniela Bartel; Sabrina Simon; Harald O Letsch; Roman R Stocsits; Yun-xia Luan; Johann Wolfgang Wägele; Günther Pass; Heike Hadrys; Bernhard Misof
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 3.260

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.