BACKGROUND: We investigated, in a sample of 491 cancer patient/caregiver dyads, the impact of caregiving on caregivers' mental and physical health over a period of one year (four assessments). Our model postulates that patient and caregiver characteristics impact caregiver experiences, and all of these in turn affect the mental and physical health of the caregiver. MATERIAL/ METHODS: Random-effects regression methods were employed to investigate how patient and caregiver characteristics affect caregiver experiences, and how these same patient and caregiver characteristics affect caregiver physical and psychological health, and are mediated by caregiver experiences. RESULTS: Caregivers' personal perceptions of the caregiving experience (impact on schedule, social functioning, abandonment) played a central role as determinants of caregiver outcomes (depression and physical health). The contextual elements that came to the foreground as either direct or indirect determinants of caregiver outcomes were the patient characteristics symptoms, depression, treatment, comorbidity and cancer site, and the caregiver characteristics education, esteem derived from caregiving, and living arrangement. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that physicians, oncologists and other health care providers involved in the care of cancer patients should be cognizant of the demands put on caregivers. Periodic assessments and dialogue with the caregiver about their experiences, needs and concerns in combination with a review of the patient's illness trajectory may be necessary to insure that caregivers are able to provide quality care to their patients and not succumb to the burdens of caregiving.
BACKGROUND: We investigated, in a sample of 491 cancerpatient/caregiver dyads, the impact of caregiving on caregivers' mental and physical health over a period of one year (four assessments). Our model postulates that patient and caregiver characteristics impact caregiver experiences, and all of these in turn affect the mental and physical health of the caregiver. MATERIAL/ METHODS: Random-effects regression methods were employed to investigate how patient and caregiver characteristics affect caregiver experiences, and how these same patient and caregiver characteristics affect caregiver physical and psychological health, and are mediated by caregiver experiences. RESULTS: Caregivers' personal perceptions of the caregiving experience (impact on schedule, social functioning, abandonment) played a central role as determinants of caregiver outcomes (depression and physical health). The contextual elements that came to the foreground as either direct or indirect determinants of caregiver outcomes were the patient characteristics symptoms, depression, treatment, comorbidity and cancer site, and the caregiver characteristics education, esteem derived from caregiving, and living arrangement. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that physicians, oncologists and other health care providers involved in the care of cancerpatients should be cognizant of the demands put on caregivers. Periodic assessments and dialogue with the caregiver about their experiences, needs and concerns in combination with a review of the patient's illness trajectory may be necessary to insure that caregivers are able to provide quality care to their patients and not succumb to the burdens of caregiving.
Authors: Laura E Dreer; Jack Berry; Patricia Rivera; Marsha Snow; Timothy R Elliott; Doreen Miller; Todd D Little Journal: J Clin Psychol Date: 2009-07
Authors: Anna Milberg; Gudrun Appelquist; Ewa Hagelin; Maria Jakobsson; Eva-Carin Olsson; Maria Olsson; Maria Friedrichsen Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2009-12-03 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Kimberly E Alexander; Bruce A Cooper; Steven M Paul; Patsy Yates; Bradley E Aouizerat; Christine Miaskowski Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2016-05-09 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Barbara A Swore Fletcher; Karen L Schumacher; Marylin Dodd; Steven M Paul; Bruce A Cooper; Kathryn Lee; Claudia West; Bradley E Aouizerat; Patrick S Swift; William Wara; Christine Miaskowski Journal: Res Nurs Health Date: 2009-04 Impact factor: 2.228