Literature DB >> 15277800

Satisfaction with breast reconstruction in women with bilateral prophylactic mastectomy: a descriptive study.

Kelly A Metcalfe1, John L Semple, Steven A Narod.   

Abstract

Prophylactic bilateral mastectomy is an option for women who are at an increased risk of developing breast cancer. Prophylactic mastectomy is often performed with immediate reconstruction (i.e., at the same time and under the same anesthetic as the mastectomy). Satisfaction with reconstruction has been described previously for women with mastectomy for breast cancer. However, the authors know of no previous research that has reported on satisfaction with reconstruction in patients who have electively sought mastectomy for the prevention of breast cancer. Women in the province of Ontario who had undergone prophylactic bilateral mastectomy plus breast reconstruction between 1991 and 2000 were asked to rate their level of satisfaction with the cosmetic results of their mastectomy and reconstruction and their overall satisfaction with their decision to have prophylactic mastectomy. Women were also asked whether they experienced complications associated with their surgery and what types of complications they experienced. Thirty-seven women completed questionnaires for this study, and all of them had immediate breast reconstruction after prophylactic mastectomy. The majority of women (70.3 percent) reported being satisfied or extremely satisfied with the cosmetic results of their breast reconstruction. Women with self-reported postsurgical complications (16.2 percent) were significantly less satisfied with reconstruction than those who did not report complications (p = 0.009). Personal subjective risk of breast cancer before prophylactic mastectomy was negatively correlated with satisfaction with reconstruction (r = -0.38, p = 0.024) and with subjective risk estimation after prophylactic surgery (r = -0.54, p = 0.001). Women who did not worry about developing breast cancer after prophylactic mastectomy had significantly higher levels of satisfaction with breast reconstruction than those who continued to worry (p < 0.001). Women who reported an improved body image after reconstruction were significantly more likely to report higher levels of satisfaction than those who reported a diminished body image (p = 0.007). The majority of women were satisfied with the cosmetic results of breast reconstruction after prophylactic mastectomy. Women who overestimated their breast cancer risk had lower satisfaction levels. Correcting overestimation of breast cancer risk in women who have prophylactic mastectomy may improve satisfaction with reconstruction following prophylactic mastectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15277800     DOI: 10.1097/01.prs.0000131877.52740.0e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  10 in total

1.  Psychosocial and Sexual Well-Being Following Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Reconstruction.

Authors:  Cindy H Wei; Amie M Scott; Alison N Price; Helen Catherine Miller; Anne F Klassen; Sabrina M Jhanwar; Babak J Mehrara; Joseph J Disa; Colleen McCarthy; Evan Matros; Peter G Cordeiro; Virgilio Sacchini; Andrea L Pusic
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.431

2.  Breast reconstruction with autologous tissue following mastectomy.

Authors:  Hr Teymouri; S Stergioula; M Eder; L Kovacs; E Biemer; Na Papadopulos
Journal:  Hippokratia       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 0.471

Review 3.  Genetic risk assessments in individuals at high risk for inherited breast cancer in the breast oncology care setting.

Authors:  Tuya Pal; Susan T Vadaparampil
Journal:  Cancer Control       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 3.302

Review 4.  Quality of life among patients after bilateral prophylactic mastectomy: a systematic review of patient-reported outcomes.

Authors:  Shantanu N Razdan; Vishal Patel; Sarah Jewell; Colleen M McCarthy
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2015-11-14       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  A position statement on optimizing the role of oncoplastic breast surgery.

Authors:  Christoph Andree; Jian Farhadi; Dennis Goossens; Jaume Masia; Isabelle Sarfati; Günter Germann; R Douglas Macmillan; Michael Scheflan; Hans-Pieter Van Not; Giuseppe Catanuto; Maurizio Bruno Nava
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2012-08-23

Review 6.  Risk-reducing mastectomy for the prevention of primary breast cancer.

Authors:  Nora E Carbine; Liz Lostumbo; Judi Wallace; Henry Ko
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-04-05

7.  Skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate reconstruction with DIEP flap after breast-conserving therapy.

Authors:  Christoph Andree; Beatrix I Munder; Katrin Seidenstuecker; Philipp Richrath; Philipp Behrendt; Tobias Köppe; Mazen Hagouan; Werner Audretsch; Carolin Nestle-Kraemling; Christian Witzel
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2012-12

8.  Time to decide about risk-reducing mastectomy: a case series of BRCA1/2 gene mutation carriers.

Authors:  Mary McCullum; Joan L Bottorff; Mary Kelly; Stephanie A Kieffer; Lynda G Balneaves
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2007-03-06       Impact factor: 2.809

9.  Counterpoint: Angelina's choice-or the choice of anyone else in her place.

Authors:  P M Parikh
Journal:  South Asian J Cancer       Date:  2014-01

10.  Long-term satisfaction and quality of life following risk reducing surgery in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers.

Authors:  Gillian W Hooker; Lesley King; Lauren Vanhusen; Kristi Graves; Beth N Peshkin; Claudine Isaacs; Kathryn L Taylor; Elizabeth Poggi; Marc D Schwartz
Journal:  Hered Cancer Clin Pract       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 2.857

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.