Literature DB >> 15277515

The Duncker illusion: intersubject variability, brief exposure, and the role of eye movements in its generation.

Ari Z Zivotofsky1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The Duncker illusion, also known as induced motion, is the illusory component of an object's motion that results from background movement. The origins of this robust phenomenon are still subject to debate. The goal of this study was to examine the role eye movements play in its generation.
METHODS: The Duncker illusion was generated by rear-projecting an LED target and a random-dot background onto a semitranslucent screen. Each moved under independent control of mirror galvanometers. The background was either stationary or moved vertically, whereas the target moved horizontally with various degrees of a vertical component. Using a two-alternative, forced-choice cancellation paradigm involving multiple interleaved staircases, seven human subjects quantified the illusion under a variety of conditions. These conditions included varying the exposure time from 50 to 200 ms.
RESULTS: The strength of the illusion did not decrease, even when exposures too brief to generate eye movement were used. Four of the subjects showed no difference between long and short exposures (P > 0.12). In two the illusion was stronger for short exposures (P < 0.05), and in one the illusion was not quantifiable. There was little intrasubject variability across trial types, yet there was a large intersubject variability in the strength of the illusion.
CONCLUSIONS: The illusion is robust in that it is perceived under a wide variety of conditions by all observers. By varying the parameters, it was possible to demonstrate that eye movements do not play a role in generating the illusion and that this robust illusion is most likely caused by the visual system attributing relative motion between target and background to target motion and ignoring any true background movement. The mechanism by which this occurs varies in degree between individuals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15277515     DOI: 10.1167/iovs.04-0031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  6 in total

1.  Rhesus monkeys behave as if they perceive the Duncker Illusion.

Authors:  A Z Zivotofsky; M E Goldberg; K D Powell
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  A Simple Target Interception Task as Test for Activities of Daily Life Performance in Older Adults.

Authors:  Alix L de Dieuleveult; Sander I B Perry; Petra C Siemonsma; Anne-Marie Brouwer; Jan B F van Erp
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2019-05-27       Impact factor: 4.677

3.  Phase integration bias in a motion grouping task.

Authors:  Jessica N Cali; Patrick J Bennett; Allison B Sekuler
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Moving Advertisements Systematically Affect Gaze Behavior and Performance in the Soccer Penalty Kick.

Authors:  Gareth Paterson; John van der Kamp; Geert Savelsbergh
Journal:  Front Sports Act Living       Date:  2020-01-14

5.  The induced motion effect is a high-level visual phenomenon: Psychophysical evidence.

Authors:  Michael Falconbridge; Kassandra Hewitt; Julia Haille; David R Badcock; Mark Edwards
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2022-09-07

6.  How similar are responses to background motion and target displacements?

Authors:  Emily M Crowe; Patou Vellekoop; Chermaine van Meteren; Jeroen B J Smeets; Eli Brenner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2022-08-16       Impact factor: 2.064

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.