Literature DB >> 15277474

The need for routine eye examinations.

Hugh R Taylor1, Hien T V Vu, Catherine A McCarty, Jill E Keeffe.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the incidence and causes of vision loss to assist in the objective determination of the preferred frequency of routine screening for those with normal vision.
METHODS: A prospective, population-based study of people aged 40 or more years. Standardized examination protocols were used that included presenting and best corrected visual acuity, visual field testing, and comprehensive eye examination with dilation.
RESULTS: There were 2529 people with a full data set, including 1590 with a normal baseline examination. The 5-year incidence of vision loss (<6/12 presenting acuity in the worse eye) was 2.39%. Overall, 24 (63%) of 38 of those with vision loss had noticed a change in their vision, and 18 (75%) of these 24 had attended an eye examination. This left only 14 (0.88%) people who had had normal baseline examination results and had asymptomatic vision loss develop over this 5-year period.
CONCLUSIONS: Frequent routine eye examinations of those with normal examination results will have a low yield and may not be cost effective. Health promotion messages should target those who notice a change in vision and those at higher risk such as those with diabetes or a family history of eye disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15277474     DOI: 10.1167/iovs.03-1198

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  6 in total

1.  Factors Associated with Visual Impairment in Chinese American Adults: The Chinese American Eye Study.

Authors:  Bruce Burkemper; Mina Torres; Xuejuan Jiang; Roberta McKean-Cowdin; Rohit Varma
Journal:  Ophthalmic Epidemiol       Date:  2019-05-31       Impact factor: 1.648

2.  How frequently should asymptomatic patients be dilated?

Authors:  Paul Varner
Journal:  J Optom       Date:  2013-05-07

3.  Frequency of incidental ocular findings during pre-employment screening at a tertiary care Eye hospital.

Authors:  Summaya Khan; Aisha Rafique; Omar Zafar
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2021 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.088

4.  Improving access to optometry services for people at risk of preventable sight loss: a qualitative study in five UK locations.

Authors:  S Leamon; C Hayden; H Lee; D Trudinger; E Appelbee; D-L Hurrell; I Richardson
Journal:  J Public Health (Oxf)       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 2.341

5.  Treatment coverage rates for refractive error in the National Eye Health survey.

Authors:  Joshua Foreman; Jing Xie; Stuart Keel; Hugh R Taylor; Mohamed Dirani
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  The validity of self-report of eye diseases in participants with vision loss in the National Eye Health Survey.

Authors:  Joshua Foreman; Jing Xie; Stuart Keel; Peter van Wijngaarden; Hugh R Taylor; Mohamed Dirani
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.