Literature DB >> 15276496

Adjunctive transmyocardial revascularization: five-year follow-up of a prospective, randomized trial.

Keith B Allen1, Robert D Dowling, Douglas R Schuch, Thomas A Pfeffer, Steven Marra, Edward A Lefrak, Tommy L Fudge, Mark Mostovych, Szabolc Szentpetery, Sibu P Saha, Douglas Murphy, Hugh Dennis.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In a prospective, randomized trial involving 263 patients who would be incompletely revascularized by coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) alone, CABG plus transmyocardial revascularization (CABG/TMR) provided an early mortality benefit with similar angina relief compared with CABG alone at 1 year. We evaluated the long-term outcome of patients randomized to CABG/TMR or CABG alone.
METHODS: Thirteen centers that enrolled 83% (218/263) of the patients in the original trial participated in this longitudinal study. Between 1996 and 1998, these centers randomized 218 patients who would be incompletely revascularized by CABG alone because of diffusely diseased target vessels to either holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (holmium:YAG) CABG/TMR (n = 110) or CABG alone (n = 108). Baseline demographics and operative characteristics were similar between groups. Follow-up (mean 5.0 +/- 1.7 years) included survival and blinded angina class assessment.
RESULTS: At this 5-year follow-up both groups experienced significant angina improvement from baseline, however, the CABG/TMR group had a lower mean angina score (0.4 +/- 0.7 vs 0.7 +/- 1.1, p = 0.05), a significantly lower proportion of patients with severe angina (class III/IV: 0% [0/68] vs 10% [6/60], p = 0.009), and a trend towards greater number of angina-free patients (78% [53/68] vs 63% [38/60], p = 0.08), compared with CABG alone patients. Kaplan-Meier survival at 6 years was similar between CABG/TMR and CABG alone patients (76% vs 80%, p = 0.90).
CONCLUSIONS: Five-year follow-up of prospectively randomized patients who would be incompletely revascularized because of diffuse coronary artery disease indicates that the addition of TMR to conventional CABG provides superior angina relief compared to CABG alone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15276496     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.04.049

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  5 in total

Review 1.  A proposed alternative mechanism of action for transmyocardial revascularization prefaced by a review of the accepted explanations.

Authors:  Marcelo Cardarelli
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2006

Review 2.  Transmyocardial laser revascularization.

Authors:  Keith A Horvath
Journal:  J Card Surg       Date:  2008 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.620

3.  Transmyocardial revascularization (TMR): current status and future directions.

Authors:  Keith B Allen; Amy Mahoney; Sanjeev Aggarwal; John Russell Davis; Eric Thompson; Alex F Pak; Jessica Heimes; A Michael Borkon
Journal:  Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2018-10-08

Review 4.  Clinical outcomes meta-analysis: measuring subendocardial perfusion and efficacy of transmyocardial laser revascularization with nuclear imaging.

Authors:  Jessika Iwanski; Shannon M Knapp; Ryan Avery; Isabel Oliva; Raymond K Wong; Raymond B Runyan; Zain Khalpey
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2017-05-19       Impact factor: 1.637

Review 5.  Remodeling an infarcted heart: novel hybrid treatment with transmyocardial revascularization and stem cell therapy.

Authors:  Jessika Iwanski; Raymond K Wong; Douglas F Larson; Alice S Ferng; Raymond B Runyan; Steven Goldstein; Zain Khalpey
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2016-06-16
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.