Literature DB >> 15274520

Evaluation of the reliability and validity of nursing outcomes classification patient outcomes and measures.

Meridean Maas1, Marion Johnson, Sue Moorhead, David Reed, Sharon Sweeney.   

Abstract

One hundred sixty-nine of the Nursing Outcomes Classification (NOC) patient outcomes were tested for interrater reliability, criterion validity, and sensitivity. In 10 field sites, ranging from hospitals to home care, pairs of nurses rated the outcome measures for 5 to 130 patients. Inter-class correlations were greater than or equal to 0.70 for 63 outcomes. Pearson's correlations with criterion measures were greater than or equal to 0.60 for 40 outcomes and from 0.39 to 0.60 for 43 additional ones. Change scores for 99 outcomes ranged from 0 to 2.0 from first to second and second to third rating. Most NOC measures demonstrated good inter-rater reliability, substantial criterion validity, and sensitivity to change. More testing and thorough training of nurses using NOC outcomes are needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 15274520     DOI: 10.1891/jnum.11.2.97.57284

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nurs Meas        ISSN: 1061-3749


  2 in total

Review 1.  Concordance between nurse-reported quality of care and quality of care as publicly reported by nurse-sensitive indicators.

Authors:  Dewi Stalpers; Renate A M M Kieft; Dimitri van der Linden; Marian J Kaljouw; Marieke J Schuurmans
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-04-06       Impact factor: 2.655

2.  Development and External Validity of a Short-Form Version of the INICIARE Scale to Classify Nursing Care Dependency Level in Acute Hospitals.

Authors:  Ana María Porcel-Gálvez; Sergio Barrientos-Trigo; Elena Fernández-García; Regina Allande-Cussó; María Dolores Quiñoz-Gallardo; José Miguel Morales-Asencio
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 3.390

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.