Literature DB >> 15274443

Volatiles associated with preferred and nonpreferred hosts of the Nantucket pine tip moth, Rhyacionia frustrana.

C Asaro1, B T Sullivan, M J Dalusky, C W Berisford.   

Abstract

Ovipositing female Nantucket pine tip moth, Rhyacionia frustrana, prefer loblolly pine, Pinus taeda L., to slash pine, Pinus elliottii Engelm, except during the first spring following planting of seedlings. Host discrimination by R. frustrana increases as seedlings develop, suggesting that changes in the chemical composition of seedlings may mediate the moth's host preferences. Volatile compounds from slash and loblolly pine seedlings were collected using solid-phase microextraction (SPME) during the first year following planting. Four collection periods coincided with adult emergence and oviposition during each of four annual generations of R. frustrana in the Georgia Coastal Plain. Infestation of slash pine peaked during the second tip moth generation and was similar to the loblolly pine infestation level. By the fourth tip moth generation, slash pine infestation levels had declined and diverged considerably from those of loblolly pine. Significant differences in relative quantities of beta-pinene, alpha-phellandrene, limonene, beta-phellandrene, bornyl acetate, beta-caryophyllene, and an unidentified sesquiterpene occurred between slash and loblolly pine during the fourth generation. However, no strong correlation was observed between any individual compound and host damage that could readily explain the temporal changes in R. frustrana host preference. Gas chromatographic-electroantennographic detection (GC-EAD) analyses of standards identified 19 different seedling-associated compounds that elicited antennal responses from R. frustrana females, indicating that a blend of terpenoids may mediate host discrimination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15274443     DOI: 10.1023/b:joec.0000028462.05927.fa

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Ecol        ISSN: 0098-0331            Impact factor:   2.626


  5 in total

1.  Effects of intensive forest management practices on insect infestation levels and loblolly pine growth.

Authors:  J T Nowak; C W Berisford
Journal:  J Econ Entomol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 2.381

2.  Monoterpene oviposition stimulants ofDioryctria amatella in volatiles from fusiform rust galls and second-year loblolly pine cones.

Authors:  J L Hanula; C W Berisford; G L Debarr
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 2.626

3.  Influence of light and temperature on monoterpene emission rates from slash pine.

Authors:  D T Tingey; M Manning; L C Grothaus; W F Burns
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1980-05       Impact factor: 8.340

4.  Electrophysiological responses of female Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) (Lepidoptera; Noctuidae) to synthetic host odours.

Authors:  L Burguiere; F Marion-Poll; A Cork
Journal:  J Insect Physiol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 2.354

5.  Identification of olfactory cues used in host-plant finding by diamondback moth,Plutella xylostella (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae).

Authors:  K A Pivnick; B J Jarvis; G P Slater
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 2.626

  5 in total
  7 in total

1.  Electrophysiological and olfactometer responses of two histerid predators to three pine bark beetle pheromones.

Authors:  William P Shepherd; Brian T Sullivan; Richard A Goyer; Kier D Klepzig
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.626

2.  Evidence for Semiochemical Divergence Between Sibling Bark Beetle Species: Dendroctonus brevicomis and Dendroctonus barberi.

Authors:  Brian T Sullivan; Amanda M Grady; Richard W Hofstetter; Deepa S Pureswaran; Cavell Brownie; Daniel Cluck; Tom W Coleman; Andrew Graves; Elizabeth Willhite; Lia Spiegel; Dwight Scarbrough; Andrew Orlemann; Gerardo Zúñiga
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 2.626

3.  Attractants for rice leaf bug, Trigonotylus caelestialium (Kirkaldy), are emitted from flowering rice panicles.

Authors:  Tatsuya Fujii; Masatoshi Hori; Kazuhiro Matsuda
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2010-08-01       Impact factor: 2.626

4.  The influence of pine volatile compounds on the olfactory response by Neodiprion sertifer (Geoffroy) females.

Authors:  Antonio Martini; Federico Botti; Guido Galletti; Paola Bocchini; Giovanni Bazzocchi; Piero Baronio; Giovanni Burgio
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2010-08-31       Impact factor: 2.626

5.  Volatiles from a mite-infested spruce clone and their effects on pine weevil behavior.

Authors:  Astrid Kännaste; Henrik Nordenhem; Göran Nordlander; Anna-Karin Borg-Karlson
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 2.626

6.  Southern pine beetle, Dendroctonus frontalis, antennal and behavioral responses to nonhost leaf and bark volatiles.

Authors:  William P Shepherd; Brian T Sullivan
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 2.626

7.  An automated approach to detecting signals in electroantennogram data.

Authors:  D H Slone; B T Sullivan
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2007-08-01       Impact factor: 2.793

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.