Literature DB >> 15274066

Interferon-alpha-2a with or without 13-cis retinoic acid in patients with progressive, measurable metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

Sophie D Fosså1, Gerald H J Mickisch, Pieter H M De Mulder, Simon Horenblas, Allan T van Oosterom, Hein van Poppel, Martin Fey, Jelle J Croles, Linda de Prijck, Martine Van Glabbeke.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (MRCC), interferon-alpha (IFN) monotherapy leads to response rates of 5-15%, dependent on the selection of patients. In 1995, preclinical and clinical data indicated an improvement of these results if IFN was combined with 13-cis retinoic acid (CRA).
METHODS: In a randomized Phase II study, patients with measurable MRCC received either subcutaneous IFN (9 MU daily; Arm A) or the same daily subcutaneous dose of IFN plus oral CRA (1 mg/kg; Arm B). A central expert panel reviewed the X-ray documentation of objective responses.
RESULTS: In the 50 eligible patients from Arm A, the objective, expert-reviewed response rate was 6% (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.3-16.6%; 2 complete responses [CRs] and 1 partial response [PR]). A 19% response rate (95% CI, 9.4-32.0%) was stated for 53 eligible patients from Arm B (2 CRs and 8 PRs). Only one of the four CRs claimed by the clinical investigator was confirmed by the central review committee. Conversely, the expert committee deemed that 3 of 12 investigator-stated PRs were CRs. Constitutional toxicity (flu-like symptoms) and/or side effects from skin, mucosa, or eyes led to discontinuation of treatment in 22% of nonprogressing patients, more often in Arm B than in Arm A.
CONCLUSIONS: The results from this randomized Phase II study support expansion of the trial into a Phase III study to evaluate the effect of IFN-CRA combination therapy on the survival of patients who undergo nephrectomy prior to IFN-based immunotherapy. The considerable interobserver variability of response evaluation (individual investigator vs. expert panel) indicates the necessity of a central review of claimed responses in future Phase II studies involving patients with MRCC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15274066     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.20307

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  6 in total

Review 1.  Immunotherapy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Karl Rohrmann; Michael Staehler; Nikolas Haseke; Alexander Bachmann; Christian G Stief; Michael Siebels
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2005-04-02       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 2.  Chemotherapy in metastatic renal cell cancer.

Authors:  Wolfgang Lilleby; Sophie D Fosså
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2005-02-22       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 3.  Combination of surgery and immunotherapy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Gerald H Mickisch; Roland H Mattes
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2005-03-25       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 4.  [Efficacy of multikinase inhibitors in the treatment of advanced renal cell cancer. A snapshot].

Authors:  M Kuczyk; S Kruck; A S Merseburger
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 5.  Immunotherapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Susanne Unverzagt; Ines Moldenhauer; Monika Nothacker; Dorothea Roßmeißl; Andreas V Hadjinicolaou; Frank Peinemann; Francesco Greco; Barbara Seliger
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-05-15

6.  A Bayesian pick-the-winner design in a randomized phase II clinical trial.

Authors:  Dung-Tsa Chen; Po-Yu Huang; Hui-Yi Lin; Alberto A Chiappori; Dmitry I Gabrilovich; Eric B Haura; Scott J Antonia; Jhanelle E Gray
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-07-07
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.